Talk:UC4

From EERAdata Wiki
Revision as of 11:50, 3 June 2020 by Małgorzatam (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.

Assessment of metadata for databases

  1. IEA Policy database
  2. COMETS
  3. JRC database hub
  4. EUR-Lex

IEA Policy database

Level of implementation of FAIR/O principles: F4 - yes; A1 - yes, A2 - yes (only depends on EU policy); I1 - yes; I2 - fulfilled, I3 - fulfilled; R1.2 Metadate seems to be spread.

  • August - example: In ideal database all country names would be linked to official registry --> you could go for all information. It would be 100% FAIR. Are any bases like that?
  • Difficulties even in defining "policy" = everything (every official document) which is published in official governmental page.
  • testing on the example of Poland and National Energy Efficency Action Plan for Poland: link to the official governmental page, not the direct link to the official document or to the official country law. When information about the date of update - should be also a linked to the local page (to ensure that the is a spossibility to chacke at the source, if the policy has been already updated.
  • if metadata doesn't provide the

if the documents are there, but you don't have an oppurtunity to get to the official, legal document.

General conclusions

  • discussion on Wilkinson FAIR proniciples --> if there are any databases which are 100% in accordance to these principles.

We only can