Talk:WS1UC4: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Access restrictions were established for this page. If you see this message, you have no access to this page.
Małgorzatam (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Małgorzatam (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
We have started segmenting databases into 2 categories: | |||
# policy relevant databases, eg. COMETS, EU Merci, | # policy relevant databases, eg. COMETS, EU Merci, | ||
Revision as of 09:33, 3 June 2020
- Perhaps, we should decide initially, if we want to only focus on databases that actually contain information on policies or if we want to include databases that include information that is not directly related to policies, but can provide information that is useful for the development of policies? E.g. The COMETS database does not contain information on policies directly, but the information contained in the COMETS database could be valuable for policy development.
- good point we have policy relevant databases and data bases with policy, but for sure both of them are important regarding the topic of uc
- this may help by assessing the database https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/f1-meta-data-assigned-globally-unique-persistent-identifiers/
- i'm thinking about IEA Policy database regarding the use case it's fit perfect
We have started segmenting databases into 2 categories:
- policy relevant databases, eg. COMETS, EU Merci,
- policy databases, eg. IEA Policy database, EUR-Lex, OECD,
From both categories, the most suitbale databases may be chosen. This will enable us to have a full spectrum - how energy policies may use both types of databases.