WS1UC4 - Revision history

Mariab: /* Main insights from discussions */

2020-08-06T09:45:19Z

Main insights from discussions

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:45, 6 August 2020
Line 223:		Line 223:
	* Two dimensions of policy for databases were formulated:		* Two dimensions of policy for databases were formulated:
	# policy domain (topic of the policy),		# policy domain (topic of the policy),
	# policy perspective / the level of goverment (for whom it's developed = local regional, national, international level etc.).		# policy perspective / the level of goverment (for whom it's developed = local, regional, national, international level etc.).
	Based on them, two categories of databases were identified:		Based on them, two categories of databases were identified:
	~~# policy relevant databases, eg. COMETS, EU Merci, PETA4,~~		# policy databases, eg. IEA Policy database, EUR-Lex, OECD, RES-Legal, MURE,
	# policy databases, eg. IEA Policy database, EUR-Lex, OECD, RES-Legal, MURE.		# policy relevant databases, eg. COMETS, EU Merci, PETA4.
	Selected databases represent both categories to ensure full spectrum.		Selected databases represent both categories to ensure full spectrum.
	*Guidelines for building a taxonomy:		*Guidelines for building a taxonomy:
Line 235:		Line 235:

	*Conclusion: there is no databases which are 100% in accordance to FAIR principles and 100% is an utopia,		*Conclusion: there is no databases which are 100% in accordance to FAIR principles and 100% is an utopia,
	*IEA Policy database has been selected to provide to EOSC.		*IEA Policy database has been selected to provide to EOSC.

	==== Suggested next steps ====		==== Suggested next steps ====

Mariab at 08:15, 11 June 2020

2020-06-11T08:15:51Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:15, 11 June 2020
Line 52:		Line 52:
	#[https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/837722 H2020 project COMETS (EU-wide inventory of collective action initiatives in the low carbon energy transition)]		#[https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/837722 H2020 project COMETS (EU-wide inventory of collective action initiatives in the low carbon energy transition)]
	#[https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/business_economy_euro/banking_and_finance/documents/200309-sustainable-finance-teg-final-report-taxonomy_en.pdf EU taxonomy for green innovation companies]		#[https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/business_economy_euro/banking_and_finance/documents/200309-sustainable-finance-teg-final-report-taxonomy_en.pdf EU taxonomy for green innovation companies]
	#[http://www.measures-odyssee-mure.eu/ MURE ~~(Mesures d'Utilisation Rationnelle de l'Energie)~~ database].		#[http://www.measures-odyssee-mure.eu/ MURE database].

	=== Discussion on the choice of databases: ===		=== Discussion on the choice of databases: ===
Line 203:		Line 203:

	== Notes from the afternoon session ==		== Notes from the afternoon session ==
	The afternoon session was dedicated to discussing metadata for the selected databases. The aim of the afternoon session is to fill out [[UC4#Metadata_assessments\|table 2 of the wiki page for the use case]] and to decide what to report back from the use case to the plenary session the next day.		The afternoon session was dedicated to discussing metadata for the selected databases. The aim of the afternoon session was to fill out [[UC4#Metadata_assessments\|table 2 of the wiki page for the use case]] and to decide what to report back from the use case to the plenary session the next day.

Mariab at 12:28, 10 June 2020

2020-06-10T12:28:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:28, 10 June 2020
Line 232:		Line 232:
	# taking into consideration two dimensions of policies: (1) policy domain and (2) policy level of goverment,		# taking into consideration two dimensions of policies: (1) policy domain and (2) policy level of goverment,
	# coordinating with other use cases: UC4 is affecting other use cases, so our keywords should not only match, but sometimes should be even taken from other use cases,		# coordinating with other use cases: UC4 is affecting other use cases, so our keywords should not only match, but sometimes should be even taken from other use cases,
	# example to be watched as a direction in taxonomy building [https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/business_economy_euro/banking_and_finance/documents/200309-sustainable-finance-teg-final-report-taxonomy_en.pdf EU taxonomy for green innovation companies].		# example to be watched as a direction in taxonomy building is [https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/business_economy_euro/banking_and_finance/documents/200309-sustainable-finance-teg-final-report-taxonomy_en.pdf EU taxonomy for green innovation companies].

	*Conclusion: there is no databases which are 100% in accordance to FAIR principles and 100% is an utopia,		*Conclusion: there is no databases which are 100% in accordance to FAIR principles and 100% is an utopia,

Mariab at 12:26, 10 June 2020

2020-06-10T12:26:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:26, 10 June 2020
Line 228:		Line 228:
	# policy databases, eg. IEA Policy database, EUR-Lex, OECD, RES-Legal, MURE.		# policy databases, eg. IEA Policy database, EUR-Lex, OECD, RES-Legal, MURE.
	Selected databases represent both categories to ensure full spectrum.		Selected databases represent both categories to ensure full spectrum.
	*~~Proposed steps of~~ building taxonomy:		*Guidelines for building a taxonomy:
	# starting on agreement of keywords plus glossary, in accordance to international standards, to ensure common understanding,		# starting on agreement of keywords plus glossary, in accordance to international standards, to ensure common understanding,
	# taking into consideration two dimensions of policies: (1) policy domain and (2) policy level of goverment,		# taking into consideration two dimensions of policies: (1) policy domain and (2) policy level of goverment,
	# coordinating with other use cases: UC4 is affecting other use cases, so our keywords should not only match, but sometimes should be even taken from other use cases,		# coordinating with other use cases: UC4 is affecting other use cases, so our keywords should not only match, but sometimes should be even taken from other use cases,
			# example to be watched as a direction in taxonomy building [https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/business_economy_euro/banking_and_finance/documents/200309-sustainable-finance-teg-final-report-taxonomy_en.pdf EU taxonomy for green innovation companies].

	*Conclusion: there is no databases which are 100% in accordance to FAIR principles and 100% is an utopia,		*Conclusion: there is no databases which are 100% in accordance to FAIR principles and 100% is an utopia,
	*IEA Policy database has been selected to provide to EOSC.		*IEA Policy database has been selected to provide to EOSC.

Mariab at 11:16, 10 June 2020

2020-06-10T11:16:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:16, 10 June 2020
Line 227:		Line 227:
	# policy relevant databases, eg. COMETS, EU Merci, PETA4,		# policy relevant databases, eg. COMETS, EU Merci, PETA4,
	# policy databases, eg. IEA Policy database, EUR-Lex, OECD, RES-Legal, MURE.		# policy databases, eg. IEA Policy database, EUR-Lex, OECD, RES-Legal, MURE.
	Selected databases represent both categories.		Selected databases represent both categories to ensure full spectrum.
	*Proposed steps of building taxonomy:		*Proposed steps of building taxonomy:
	# starting on agreement of keywords plus glossary, in accordance to international standards, to ensure common understanding,		# starting on agreement of keywords plus glossary, in accordance to international standards, to ensure common understanding,

Mariab at 10:43, 10 June 2020

2020-06-10T10:43:06Z

Mariab at 10:40, 10 June 2020

2020-06-10T10:40:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:40, 10 June 2020
Line 224:		Line 224:
	# policy domain (topic of the policy)		# policy domain (topic of the policy)
	# policy perspective / the level of goverment (for whom it's developed = local regional, national, international level etc.).		# policy perspective / the level of goverment (for whom it's developed = local regional, national, international level etc.).
	~~_Based~~ on them, two categories of databases were identified:		Based on them, two categories of databases were identified:
	# policy relevant databases, eg. COMETS, EU Merci, PETA4		# policy relevant databases, eg. COMETS, EU Merci, PETA4
	# policy databases, eg. IEA Policy database, EUR-Lex, OECD, RES-Legal, MURE		# policy databases, eg. IEA Policy database, EUR-Lex, OECD, RES-Legal, MURE
	~~_Selected~~ databases represent both categories.		Selected databases represent both categories.
	*Proposed steps of building taxonomy:		*Proposed steps of building taxonomy:
	# starting on agreement of keywords plus glossary, in accordance to international standards, to ensure common understanding.		# starting on agreement of keywords plus glossary, in accordance to international standards, to ensure common understanding.

Mariab at 10:39, 10 June 2020

2020-06-10T10:39:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:39, 10 June 2020
Line 196:		Line 196:

	======Selected databases as a result of the morning discussion:======		======Selected databases as a result of the morning discussion:======
	# ~~COMETS~~,		# [[WS1UC4#IEA_Policy_database\|IEA Policy database]],
	# ~~EUR~~-~~Lex~~,		# [[WS1UC4#COMETS_database:_EU-wide_inventory_of_collective_action_initiatives_in_the_energy_transition\|COMETS]],
	# ~~IEA Policy~~ database,		# [[WS1UC4#JRC-database_hub:_Joint_Research_Centre_Data_Catalogue\|JRC database hub]],
	# ~~JRC~~.		# [[WS1UC4#EUR-Lex\|EUR-Lex]].


Line 224:		Line 224:
	# policy domain (topic of the policy)		# policy domain (topic of the policy)
	# policy perspective / the level of goverment (for whom it's developed = local regional, national, international level etc.).		# policy perspective / the level of goverment (for whom it's developed = local regional, national, international level etc.).
	~~Based~~ on them, two categories of databases were identified:		_Based on them, two categories of databases were identified:
	# policy relevant databases, eg. COMETS, EU Merci, PETA4		# policy relevant databases, eg. COMETS, EU Merci, PETA4
	# policy databases, eg. IEA Policy database, EUR-Lex, OECD, RES-Legal, MURE		# policy databases, eg. IEA Policy database, EUR-Lex, OECD, RES-Legal, MURE
	~~Selected~~ databases represent both categories.		_Selected databases represent both categories.
	*Proposed steps of building taxonomy:		*Proposed steps of building taxonomy:
	# starting on agreement of keywords plus glossary, in accordance to international standards, to ensure common understanding.		# starting on agreement of keywords plus glossary, in accordance to international standards, to ensure common understanding.

Mariab at 10:35, 10 June 2020

2020-06-10T10:35:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:35, 10 June 2020
Line 193:		Line 193:
	* Sources of the database are coming in a variety of European languages. Thus, it helps to investigate the relevance for FAIRification and opening activities.		* Sources of the database are coming in a variety of European languages. Thus, it helps to investigate the relevance for FAIRification and opening activities.
	* The database is cross-use case relevant, as it contains DOIs and citations relevant also for other use cases.		* The database is cross-use case relevant, as it contains DOIs and citations relevant also for other use cases.


	======Selected databases as a result of the morning discussion:======		======Selected databases as a result of the morning discussion:======
Line 234:		Line 235:
	*IEA Policy database has been selected to provide to EOSC.		*IEA Policy database has been selected to provide to EOSC.

	==== Suggested next steps ====		==== Suggested next steps ====

	* Develop methodological aspects using the example of COMES database,		* Develop methodological aspects using the example of COMES database,

Mariab at 10:34, 10 June 2020

2020-06-10T10:34:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:43, 10 June 2020
Line 214:		Line 214:
	== What to report back to the plenary on Day 3? ==		== What to report back to the plenary on Day 3? ==
	==== Databases selected ====		==== Databases selected ====
	# [[WS1UC4#IEA_Policy_database\|IEA Policy database]]		# [[WS1UC4#IEA_Policy_database\|IEA Policy database]],
	# [[WS1UC4#COMETS_database:_EU-wide_inventory_of_collective_action_initiatives_in_the_energy_transition\|COMETS]]		# [[WS1UC4#COMETS_database:_EU-wide_inventory_of_collective_action_initiatives_in_the_energy_transition\|COMETS]],
	# [[WS1UC4#JRC-database_hub:_Joint_Research_Centre_Data_Catalogue\|JRC database hub]]		# [[WS1UC4#JRC-database_hub:_Joint_Research_Centre_Data_Catalogue\|JRC database hub]],
	# [[WS1UC4#EUR-Lex\|EUR-Lex]]		# [[WS1UC4#EUR-Lex\|EUR-Lex]].

	==== Main insights from discussions ====		==== Main insights from discussions ====

	* Two dimensions of policy for databases were formulated:		* Two dimensions of policy for databases were formulated:
	# policy domain (topic of the policy)		# policy domain (topic of the policy),
	# policy perspective / the level of goverment (for whom it's developed = local regional, national, international level etc.).		# policy perspective / the level of goverment (for whom it's developed = local regional, national, international level etc.).
	Based on them, two categories of databases were identified:		Based on them, two categories of databases were identified:
	# policy relevant databases, eg. COMETS, EU Merci, PETA4		# policy relevant databases, eg. COMETS, EU Merci, PETA4,
	# policy databases, eg. IEA Policy database, EUR-Lex, OECD, RES-Legal, MURE		# policy databases, eg. IEA Policy database, EUR-Lex, OECD, RES-Legal, MURE.
	Selected databases represent both categories.		Selected databases represent both categories.
	*Proposed steps of building taxonomy:		*Proposed steps of building taxonomy:
	# starting on agreement of keywords plus glossary, in accordance to international standards, to ensure common understanding.		# starting on agreement of keywords plus glossary, in accordance to international standards, to ensure common understanding,
	# taking into consideration two dimensions of policies: (1) policy domain and (2) policy level of goverment		# taking into consideration two dimensions of policies: (1) policy domain and (2) policy level of goverment,
	# coordinating with other use cases: UC4 is affecting other use cases, so our keywords should not only match, but sometimes should be even taken from other use cases.		# coordinating with other use cases: UC4 is affecting other use cases, so our keywords should not only match, but sometimes should be even taken from other use cases,
	*Conclusion: there is no databases which are 100% in accordance to FAIR principles and 100% is an utopia.		*Conclusion: there is no databases which are 100% in accordance to FAIR principles and 100% is an utopia,
	*IEA Policy database has been selected to provide to EOSC.		*IEA Policy database has been selected to provide to EOSC.

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:34, 10 June 2020
Line 155:		Line 155:
	'' Description of the database: ''		'' Description of the database: ''
	MURE (Mesures d'Utilisation Rationnelle de l'Energie) is a comprehensive database that lists energy efficiency policies and measures regarding the Member States of the European Union. It allows for the analysis of policies based on topics, policy interaction, policy scoring, impact evaluation, as well as successful policies. The information is accessible by query in the database. The contributors are French Environment and Energy Management Agency, European Energy Network, and the H2020 program of the European Union.		MURE (Mesures d'Utilisation Rationnelle de l'Energie) is a comprehensive database that lists energy efficiency policies and measures regarding the Member States of the European Union. It allows for the analysis of policies based on topics, policy interaction, policy scoring, impact evaluation, as well as successful policies. The information is accessible by query in the database. The contributors are French Environment and Energy Management Agency, European Energy Network, and the H2020 program of the European Union.
			MURE Online Database relates to the Odyssee database on energy-efficiency indicators and energy consumption.
	~~Relates~~ to the Odyssee database on energy-efficiency indicators and energy consumption.

	~~Reference: [http://www.measures-odyssee-mure.eu Odyssee-MURE project]~~

	'' Rationale for choosing this database: ''		'' Rationale for choosing this database: ''
Line 165:		Line 162:
	* The database hosts information that would be gathered from national sources of each country, hence may be considered as a repository for national databases.		* The database hosts information that would be gathered from national sources of each country, hence may be considered as a repository for national databases.
	* The database pertains to both Uses Case 4 on Energy Policies and Use Case 1 on Buildings Efficiency.		* The database pertains to both Uses Case 4 on Energy Policies and Use Case 1 on Buildings Efficiency.

			Reference: [http://www.measures-odyssee-mure.eu Odyssee-MURE project]

	==== JRC-database hub: Joint Research Centre Data Catalogue ====		==== JRC-database hub: Joint Research Centre Data Catalogue ====
	'' Description of database: ''		'' Description of database: ''
	The JRC Science Hub aims to gradually integrate and aggregate all of the European Commission's science related activities, tools, laboratories, facilities, databases and networks. The inventory is wide range of the compilation of databases development of software and modelling tools. Published on the basis of open data principles with clear descriptions for each entry. The tools and databases are categorised by name and acronym, but can be filtered by research area, keyword and JRC institute responsible for the coordination of the particular entry. It contains, inter alia, databases related to energy and transport and climate.		The JRC Science Hub aims to gradually integrate and aggregate all of the European Commission's science related activities, tools, laboratories, facilities, databases and networks. The inventory is wide range of the compilation of databases development of software and modelling tools. Published on the basis of open data principles with clear descriptions for each entry. The tools and databases are categorised by name and acronym, but can be filtered by research area, keyword and JRC institute responsible for the coordination of the particular entry. It contains, inter alia, databases related to energy and transport and climate.

	'' Rationale for choosing this database: ''		'' Rationale for choosing this database: ''
	* It’s the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to different related aspects also energy policy related.		* It’s the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to different related aspects also energy policy related.
Line 192:		Line 192:
	* DataCite provides an integrated search interface, where it is possible to search and filter a relevant metadata gathered.		* DataCite provides an integrated search interface, where it is possible to search and filter a relevant metadata gathered.
	* Sources of the database are coming in a variety of European languages. Thus, it helps to investigate the relevance for FAIRification and opening activities.		* Sources of the database are coming in a variety of European languages. Thus, it helps to investigate the relevance for FAIRification and opening activities.
	* The database ~~may be~~ cross-use case relevant, as it contains DOIs and citations relevant also for other use cases.		* The database is cross-use case relevant, as it contains DOIs and citations relevant also for other use cases.


	======Selected databases as a result of the morning discussion:======		======Selected databases as a result of the morning discussion:======
Line 237:		Line 236:
	==== Suggested next steps ====		==== Suggested next steps ====

	* ~~Developing~~ methodological aspects using the example of COMES database,		* Develop methodological aspects using the example of COMES database,
	* ~~Extending~~ metadata based on JP Wind,		* Extend metadata based on JP Wind,
	* ~~Recommendations~~ for IEA Policy database ~~will be prepared~~ for WS5 (WS5 is hoted by IEA; particular emphasis will be placed on the machine accessibility aspect),		* Prepare recommendations for IEA Policy database for WS5 (WS5 is hoted by IEA; particular emphasis will be placed on the machine accessibility aspect),
	*~~To have~~ a deeper look at the metadata of the chosen DBs,		* Take a deeper look at the metadata of the chosen DBs,
	* Collaborate with other UC teams and also experts outside the EERAdata project.		* Collaborate with other UC teams and also experts outside the EERAdata project.