WS1UC3 - Revision history

Massimoc: /* What to report back to the plenary on Day 3? */

2020-06-04T09:30:45Z

What to report back to the plenary on Day 3?

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:30, 4 June 2020
Line 143:		Line 143:
	** To figure out if there are links with other use cases		** To figure out if there are links with other use cases
	** To know EERA JPs activities to understand if materials are considered and which are the metadata of their interest		** To know EERA JPs activities to understand if materials are considered and which are the metadata of their interest
			** To analyze WIND metadata with HVL and discuss it with Annamaria Sempreviva (EERA JP Wind)

	* Other issues		* Other issues

Massimoc: /* Details of FAIR criteria assessments */

2020-06-04T08:27:58Z

Details of FAIR criteria assessments

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:27, 4 June 2020
Line 112:		Line 112:

	=== Details of FAIR criteria assessments ===		=== Details of FAIR criteria assessments ===
	* MatDB		* MatDB (thanks Tim!!)
	** F1. (meta)data are assigned a globally unique and eternally persistent identifier - ''yes, either a DataCite DOI or a (resolvable) database technical key'';		** F1. (meta)data are assigned a globally unique and eternally persistent identifier - ''yes, either a DataCite DOI or a (resolvable) database technical key'';
	** F2. data are described with rich metadata - ''yes because the MatDB source entity extends to fields about the organisation, projects, data creators, etc.'';		** F2. data are described with rich metadata - ''yes because the MatDB source entity extends to fields about the organisation, projects, data creators, etc.'';

Massimoc: /* What to report back to the plenary on Day 3? */

2020-06-04T08:11:48Z

What to report back to the plenary on Day 3?

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:11, 4 June 2020
Line 135:		Line 135:
	** Metadata are tightly linked with the expertise in the field.		** Metadata are tightly linked with the expertise in the field.
	** there is not a unique definition of metadata: bibliography metadata (Tim) or everything is metadata (NOMAD) ??		** there is not a unique definition of metadata: bibliography metadata (Tim) or everything is metadata (NOMAD) ??
	** ~~There are no~~ standards		** It seems there is a lacking of standards
	** Tim was pointing out that interoperability is really an issue		** Tim was pointing out that interoperability is really an issue
	** The data that are available are increasing every day. This implies cost issues both to manage them and to analyze them. What can be done for this? Quality ?? political indications ?? standards ??		** Holger: The data that are available are increasing every day. This implies cost issues both to manage them and to analyze them. What can be done for this? Quality ?? political indications ?? standards ??

	* Suggested next steps		* Suggested next steps

Massimoc: /* Discussion on the choice of databases: */

2020-06-04T08:07:08Z

Discussion on the choice of databases:

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:07, 4 June 2020
Line 98:		Line 98:
	* DBs should be select allowing interoperability among them, for example a DB on crystallography could be used with another that provides band structures and related properties.		* DBs should be select allowing interoperability among them, for example a DB on crystallography could be used with another that provides band structures and related properties.

	* Valeria suggests to have a look to Critical Raw Materials [https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/raw-materials/specific-interest/critical_en CRM]		* Valeria suggests to have a look to Critical Raw Materials [https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/raw-materials/specific-interest/critical_en CRM]. [https://ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/raw-materials/eip_en The European innovation partnership (EIP) on raw materials]

	* NOMAD is a very interesting DB but it is only about Computational Materials Science at the atomic scale. It is mainly focussed on ab-initio calculations. However there is an interesting ongoing activities in FAIRification. However some very popular computational DBs are already included in NOMAD		* NOMAD is a very interesting DB but it is only about Computational Materials Science at the atomic scale. It is mainly focussed on ab-initio calculations. However there is an interesting ongoing activities in FAIRification. However some very popular computational DBs are already included in NOMAD

Massimoc: /* Participants expertises */

2020-06-04T08:01:13Z

Participants expertises

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:01, 4 June 2020
Line 35:		Line 35:
	* The AIT group is working mainly in the field of PV, both from the point of view materials (low toxicity, usability, ...) and from the point of view of systems and module (engineering, efficiency, quality, ...). AIT is leading the development of the EERAdata platform, for this reason it is joining the session to discuss the use case needs.		* The AIT group is working mainly in the field of PV, both from the point of view materials (low toxicity, usability, ...) and from the point of view of systems and module (engineering, efficiency, quality, ...). AIT is leading the development of the EERAdata platform, for this reason it is joining the session to discuss the use case needs.

	* JRC is managing a large DB about structural materials. They pay a lot of attention to FAIR ~~principle~~:		* JRC is managing a large DB about structural materials. They pay a lot of attention to FAIR principles:
	** ~~access~~: not all the information in the DB are open. This helped private companies to provide and reuse data.		** Access: not all the information in the DB are open. This helped private companies to provide and reuse data.
	** ~~interoperability~~: standardization procedures in collaboration with CEN.		** Interoperability: standardization procedures in collaboration with CEN.
	** Reusability: this is related to quality issues. Reviewers or commettees are often involved in the definition of the quality level.		** Reusability: this is related to quality issues. Reviewers or commettees are often involved in the definition of the quality level.

Karolinaj: /* Participants */

2020-06-04T05:22:42Z

Participants

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:22, 4 June 2020
Line 27:		Line 27:
	* Constantin V. Beck (HVL)		* Constantin V. Beck (HVL)
	* Mehran Ziaabadi (HVL)		* Mehran Ziaabadi (HVL)
	* Karolina ~~Jadeiko~~-~~Skubes~~ (GIG)		* Karolina Jąderko-Skubis (GIG)
	* Francesco Buonocore (ENEA)		* Francesco Buonocore (ENEA)
	* Massimo Celino (ENEA)		* Massimo Celino (ENEA)

Valerias: /* What to report back to the plenary on Day 3? */

2020-06-04T03:49:35Z

What to report back to the plenary on Day 3?

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:49, 4 June 2020
Line 134:		Line 134:
	* Main insights from discussions:		* Main insights from discussions:
	** Metadata are tightly linked with the expertise in the field.		** Metadata are tightly linked with the expertise in the field.
	** there is not an unique definition of metadata: bibliography metadata (Tim) or everything is metadata (NOMAD) ??		** there is not a unique definition of metadata: bibliography metadata (Tim) or everything is metadata (NOMAD) ??
	** There are no standards		** There are no standards
	** Tim was pointing out that interoperability is really an issue		** Tim was pointing out that interoperability is really an issue
	** The data that are available are increasing ~~everyday~~. This implies ~~costs~~ issues both to manage them and to analyze them. What can be done for this? Quality ?? political indications ?? standards ??		** The data that are available are increasing every day. This implies cost issues both to manage them and to analyze them. What can be done for this? Quality ?? political indications ?? standards ??

	* Suggested next steps		* Suggested next steps

	** To have a deeper look at the metadata of the chosen DBs		** To have a deeper look at the metadata of the chosen DBs
	** To figure out if there are links with other use cases		** To figure out if there are links with other use cases
	** To know EERA JPs activities to understand if materials are considered and which are the metadata of their interest		** To know EERA JPs activities to understand if materials are considered and which are the metadata of their interest




	* Other issues		* Other issues

Valerias: /* Draft list of databases */

2020-06-04T03:48:24Z

Draft list of databases

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:48, 4 June 2020
Line 48:		Line 48:

	=== Draft list of databases ===		=== Draft list of databases ===
	* Add bulleted list item or table entry

	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"

Massimoc: /* What to report back to the plenary on Day 3? */

2020-06-03T16:13:09Z

What to report back to the plenary on Day 3?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:13, 3 June 2020
Line 135:		Line 135:
	* Main insights from discussions:		* Main insights from discussions:
	** Metadata are tightly linked with the expertise in the field.		** Metadata are tightly linked with the expertise in the field.
			** there is not an unique definition of metadata: bibliography metadata (Tim) or everything is metadata (NOMAD) ??
	** There are no standards		** There are no standards
	** Tim was pointing out that interoperability is really an issue		** Tim was pointing out that interoperability is really an issue

Massimoc: /* What to report back to the plenary on Day 3? */

2020-06-03T16:11:39Z

What to report back to the plenary on Day 3?

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 3 June 2020
Line 133:		Line 133:
	* Databases selected (names and short reasoning)		* Databases selected (names and short reasoning)

	* Main insights from discussions		* Main insights from discussions:

	** Metadata are tightly linked with the expertise in the field.		** Metadata are tightly linked with the expertise in the field.
	** There are no standards		** There are no standards
	** Tim was pointing out that interoperability is really an issue		** Tim was pointing out that interoperability is really an issue
			** The data that are available are increasing everyday. This implies costs issues both to manage them and to analyze them. What can be done for this? Quality ?? political indications ?? standards ??

	* Suggested next steps		* Suggested next steps