UC2 - Revision history

Rezaa: /* List of selected databases */

2020-06-03T12:23:20Z

List of selected databases

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:23, 3 June 2020
Line 5:		Line 5:

	== List of selected databases ==		== List of selected databases ==
	During the first workshop (see notes from Day 2), the ~~following~~ databases were selected to analyze and improve their compliance with FAIR and Open data principles:		The team selected eight datasets before the workshop. During the first workshop (see notes from Day 2), the four databases were selected to further analyze and improve their compliance with FAIR and Open data principles:
	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	\|-		\|-

Rezaa: /* List of selected databases */

2020-06-03T12:21:56Z

List of selected databases

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:21, 3 June 2020
Line 72:		Line 72:
	R1.1 100% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 90%		R1.1 100% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 90%
	\|\| Improve I2 for using vocabularies that follow FAIR principles		\|\| Improve I2 for using vocabularies that follow FAIR principles

	\|-
	~~\| Example \|\| Example \|\| Example \|\| Example \|\| Example~~
	\|-
	~~\| Example \|\| Example \|\| Example \|\| Example \|\| Example~~
	\|-
	~~\| Example \|\| Example \|\| Example \|\| Example \|\| Example~~
	\|}		\|}

Christopherbs: Cleaned up minor issues

2020-06-03T12:08:23Z

Cleaned up minor issues

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:08, 3 June 2020
Line 92:		Line 92:
	\|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 100% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 100% / R1.1 50% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 100%		\|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 100% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 100% / R1.1 50% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 100%
	\|\| Taxonomy		\|\| Taxonomy
	\|\| xml, plain text, RDF, ~~etc.''~~ xml, csv, json, jupyter		\|\| xml, plain text, RDF, xml, csv, json, jupyter, etc.
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://www.eia.gov/ EIA]		\| [https://www.eia.gov/ EIA]
Line 106:		Line 106:
	\|\| F1 50% - F2 50% - F3 20% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 50% / I1 100% - I2 80% - I3 80% / R1.1 20% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100%.		\|\| F1 50% - F2 50% - F3 20% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 50% / I1 100% - I2 80% - I3 80% / R1.1 20% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100%.
	\|\| Taxonomy		\|\| Taxonomy
	\|\| xls, csv, pdf, etc.''		\|\| xls, csv, pdf, etc.
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://transparency.entsoe.eu/ ENTSO-E Transparency Platform]		\| [https://transparency.entsoe.eu/ ENTSO-E Transparency Platform]

Rezaa: /* Metadata assessments */

2020-06-03T12:05:40Z

Metadata assessments

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:05, 3 June 2020
Line 91:		Line 91:
	\|\| Rich		\|\| Rich
	\|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 100% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 100% / R1.1 50% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 100%		\|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 100% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 100% / R1.1 50% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 100%
	\|\| ~~''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?''~~ Taxonomy		\|\| Taxonomy
	\|\| ~~''How are metadata implemented? As~~ xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, json, jupyter		\|\| xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, json, jupyter
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://www.eia.gov/ EIA]		\| [https://www.eia.gov/ EIA]
Line 98:		Line 98:
	\|\| Medium		\|\| Medium
	\|\| F1 50% - F2 50% - F3 30% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 50%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 50% / R1.1 50% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100%		\|\| F1 50% - F2 50% - F3 30% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 50%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 50% / R1.1 50% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100%
	\|\| ~~''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?''~~ Taxonomy		\|\| Taxonomy
	\|\| ~~''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.''~~ xml, csv, text, PDF		\|\| xml, csv, text, PDF
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://www.pse.pl/web/pse-eng/data PSE]		\| [https://www.pse.pl/web/pse-eng/data PSE]
Line 105:		Line 105:
	\|\| Medium		\|\| Medium
	\|\| F1 50% - F2 50% - F3 20% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 50% / I1 100% - I2 80% - I3 80% / R1.1 20% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100%.		\|\| F1 50% - F2 50% - F3 20% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 50% / I1 100% - I2 80% - I3 80% / R1.1 20% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100%.
	\|\| ~~''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?''~~ Taxonomy		\|\| Taxonomy
	\|\| ~~''How are metadata implemented? As~~ xls, csv, pdf, etc.''		\|\| xls, csv, pdf, etc.''
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://transparency.entsoe.eu/ ENTSO-E Transparency Platform]		\| [https://transparency.entsoe.eu/ ENTSO-E Transparency Platform]

Rezaa: /* Metadata assessments */

2020-06-03T12:04:41Z

Metadata assessments

@@ Line 100: / Line 100: @@
 || ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' Taxonomy
 || ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, text, PDF
 |-
 | [https://www.pse.pl/web/pse-eng/data PSE]
@@ Line 109: / Line 107: @@
 || ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' Taxonomy
 || ''How are metadata implemented? As xls, csv, pdf,  etc.''
 |-
 | [https://transparency.entsoe.eu/ ENTSO-E Transparency Platform]
@@ Line 120: / Line 115: @@
 || csv, xlsx, xml, xml zip, graphs and charts
 |-
 |}

Rezaa: /* Metadata assessments */

2020-06-03T12:02:12Z

Metadata assessments

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:02, 3 June 2020
Line 90:		Line 90:
	\|\| Administrative 100%, Descriptive 100%, Structural 100%		\|\| Administrative 100%, Descriptive 100%, Structural 100%
	\|\| Rich		\|\| Rich
	\|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 100% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 100% / R1.1 ~~100~~% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 100%		\|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 100% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 100% / R1.1 50% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 100%
	\|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' Taxonomy		\|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' Taxonomy
	\|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, json, jupyter		\|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, json, jupyter
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://www.eia.gov/ EIA]		\| [https://www.eia.gov/ EIA]
	\|\| Administrative 80%, ~~descriptive~~ 100%, ~~structural~~ 100%		\|\| Administrative 80%, Descriptive 100%, Structural 100%
	\|\| ~~Rich~~		\|\| Medium
	\|\| F1 50% - F2 50% - F3 30% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 50%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 50% / R1.1 ~~100~~% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100%		\|\| F1 50% - F2 50% - F3 30% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 50%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 50% / R1.1 50% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100%
	\|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' Taxonomy		\|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' Taxonomy
	\|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, text, PDF		\|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, text, PDF
Line 103:		Line 103:
	\| [https://openei.org/ OpenEI] \|\| Administrative 80%, descriptive 100%, structural 100% \|\| Medium \|\| F1 50% - F2 70% - F3 70% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 50% - A2 50%/ I1 50% - I2 50% - I3 100% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100% \|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' taxonomy \|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, text, PDF		\| [https://openei.org/ OpenEI] \|\| Administrative 80%, descriptive 100%, structural 100% \|\| Medium \|\| F1 50% - F2 70% - F3 70% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 50% - A2 50%/ I1 50% - I2 50% - I3 100% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100% \|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' taxonomy \|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, text, PDF
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://www.pse.pl/web/pse-eng/data PSE] \|\| Administrative 80%, ~~descriptive 100~~%, ~~structural~~ 100% \|\| ~~Rich~~ \|\| F1 80% - F2 ~~100~~% - F3 ~~100~~% - F4 ~~100~~% ~~- A1 100% -~~ A1.1 100% - A1.2 50% - A2 ~~100~~% - I1 100% - I2 ~~100~~% - I3 80% - R1.1 ~~100~~% - R1.2 ~~100~~% - R1.3 80%		\| [https://www.pse.pl/web/pse-eng/data PSE]
	\|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' ~~taxonomy~~ \|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xls, csv, pdf, etc.''		\|\| Administrative 80%, Descriptive 90%, Structural 100%
			\|\| Medium
			\|\| F1 50% - F2 50% - F3 20% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 50% / I1 100% - I2 80% - I3 80% / R1.1 20% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100%.
			\|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' Taxonomy
			\|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xls, csv, pdf, etc.''
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://www.nrel.gov/grid/data-tools.htmla NREL] \|\| Administrative 100%, descriptive 100%, structural 80% \|\| Rich \|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 80% - F4 100% - A1.1 100% - A1.2 100% - A2 100% - I1 80% - I2 80% - I3 100% - R1.1 100% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 80%		\| [https://www.nrel.gov/grid/data-tools.htmla NREL] \|\| Administrative 100%, descriptive 100%, structural 80% \|\| Rich \|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 80% - F4 100% - A1.1 100% - A1.2 100% - A2 100% - I1 80% - I2 80% - I3 100% - R1.1 100% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 80%
Line 111:		Line 115:
	\| [https://transparency.entsoe.eu/ ENTSO-E Transparency Platform]		\| [https://transparency.entsoe.eu/ ENTSO-E Transparency Platform]
	\|\| Administrative 50%, descriptive 50%, structural 50%		\|\| Administrative 50%, descriptive 50%, structural 50%
	\|\| ~~Metadata is partly described, some of basic metadata are missing or not clear to identify~~		\|\| Medium-Low
	\|\| F1 50 % - F2 50% - F3 20% - F4 100% A1.1 100% - A1.2 100% - A2 50% I1 100% - I2 80% - I3 100% R1.1 50% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 90%		\|\| F1 50 % - F2 50% - F3 20% - F4 100% A1.1 100% - A1.2 100% - A2 50% I1 100% - I2 80% - I3 100% R1.1 50% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 90%
	\|\| Taxonomy		\|\| Taxonomy
	\|\| ~~Csv~~, xlsx, xml, xml zip, graphs and charts		\|\| csv, xlsx, xml, xml zip, graphs and charts

	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://www.smard.de/en/ SMARD (Strommarktdaten)]		\| [https://www.smard.de/en/ SMARD (Strommarktdaten)]

Rezaa: /* List of selected databases */

2020-06-03T11:52:47Z

List of selected databases

Rezaa: /* Metadata assessments */

2020-06-03T11:48:19Z

Metadata assessments

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:48, 3 June 2020
Line 91:		Line 91:
	\|\| Rich		\|\| Rich
	\|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 100% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 100% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 100%		\|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 100% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 100% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 100%
	\|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' ~~taxonomy~~		\|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' Taxonomy
	\|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, json, jupyter		\|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, json, jupyter
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://www.eia.gov/ EIA] \|\| Administrative 80%, descriptive 100%, structural 100% \|\| Rich \|\| F1 ~~100~~% - F2 ~~100~~% - F3 ~~100~~% - F4 70% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 ~~100~~% - A2 ~~100~~%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 70% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100% \|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' ~~taxonomy~~ \|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, text, PDF		\| [https://www.eia.gov/ EIA]
			\|\| Administrative 80%, descriptive 100%, structural 100%
			\|\| Rich
			\|\| F1 50% - F2 50% - F3 30% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 50%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 50% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100%
			\|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' Taxonomy
			\|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, text, PDF
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://openei.org/ OpenEI] \|\| Administrative 80%, descriptive 100%, structural 100% \|\| Medium \|\| F1 50% - F2 70% - F3 70% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 50% - A2 50%/ I1 50% - I2 50% - I3 100% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100% \|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' taxonomy \|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, text, PDF		\| [https://openei.org/ OpenEI] \|\| Administrative 80%, descriptive 100%, structural 100% \|\| Medium \|\| F1 50% - F2 70% - F3 70% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 50% - A2 50%/ I1 50% - I2 50% - I3 100% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100% \|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' taxonomy \|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, text, PDF

Rezaa: /* Metadata assessments */

2020-06-03T11:40:36Z

Metadata assessments

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:40, 3 June 2020
Line 87:		Line 87:
	! Name of database !! Type of metadata provided !! Extend of metadata provided !! Level of implementation of FAIR/O principles !! Frameworks for metadata used !! Technical implementation of metadata		! Name of database !! Type of metadata provided !! Extend of metadata provided !! Level of implementation of FAIR/O principles !! Frameworks for metadata used !! Technical implementation of metadata
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://open-power-system-data.org/ OPSD] \|\| ~~[refer to DC table in word file]~~ Administrative 100%, Descriptive 100%, Structural 100% \|\| Rich \|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 80% - F4 100% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 ~~100~~% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 80% - I3 100% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 90% \|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' taxonomy \|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, json, jupyter		\| [https://open-power-system-data.org/ OPSD]
			\|\| Administrative 100%, Descriptive 100%, Structural 100%
			\|\| Rich
			\|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 100% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 100% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 100%
			\|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' taxonomy
			\|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, json, jupyter
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://www.eia.gov/ EIA] \|\| Administrative 80%, descriptive 100%, structural 100% \|\| Rich \|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 70% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 100% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 70% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100% \|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' taxonomy \|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, text, PDF		\| [https://www.eia.gov/ EIA] \|\| Administrative 80%, descriptive 100%, structural 100% \|\| Rich \|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 70% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 100% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 70% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100% \|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' taxonomy \|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, text, PDF

Rezaa: /* Metadata assessments */

2020-06-03T11:31:56Z

Metadata assessments

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:31, 3 June 2020
Line 87:		Line 87:
	! Name of database !! Type of metadata provided !! Extend of metadata provided !! Level of implementation of FAIR/O principles !! Frameworks for metadata used !! Technical implementation of metadata		! Name of database !! Type of metadata provided !! Extend of metadata provided !! Level of implementation of FAIR/O principles !! Frameworks for metadata used !! Technical implementation of metadata
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://open-power-system-data.org/ OPSD] \|\| [refer to DC table in word file] Administrative 70%, ~~descriptive~~ 100%, ~~structural~~ 100% \|\| Rich \|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 80% - F4 100% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 100% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 80% - I3 100% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 90% \|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' taxonomy \|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, json, jupyter		\| [https://open-power-system-data.org/ OPSD] \|\| [refer to DC table in word file] Administrative 100%, Descriptive 100%, Structural 100% \|\| Rich \|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 80% - F4 100% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 100% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 80% - I3 100% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 90% \|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' taxonomy \|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, json, jupyter
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://www.eia.gov/ EIA] \|\| Administrative 80%, descriptive 100%, structural 100% \|\| Rich \|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 70% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 100% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 70% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100% \|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' taxonomy \|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, text, PDF		\| [https://www.eia.gov/ EIA] \|\| Administrative 80%, descriptive 100%, structural 100% \|\| Rich \|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 70% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 100% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 70% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100% \|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' taxonomy \|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, text, PDF

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:05, 3 June 2020
Line 91:		Line 91:
	\|\| Rich		\|\| Rich
	\|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 100% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 100% / R1.1 50% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 100%		\|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 100% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 100% / R1.1 50% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 100%
	\|\| ~~''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?''~~ Taxonomy		\|\| Taxonomy
	\|\| ~~''How are metadata implemented? As~~ xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, json, jupyter		\|\| xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, json, jupyter
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://www.eia.gov/ EIA]		\| [https://www.eia.gov/ EIA]
Line 98:		Line 98:
	\|\| Medium		\|\| Medium
	\|\| F1 50% - F2 50% - F3 30% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 50%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 50% / R1.1 50% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100%		\|\| F1 50% - F2 50% - F3 30% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 50%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 50% / R1.1 50% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100%
	\|\| ~~''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?''~~ Taxonomy		\|\| Taxonomy
	\|\| ~~''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.''~~ xml, csv, text, PDF		\|\| xml, csv, text, PDF
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://www.pse.pl/web/pse-eng/data PSE]		\| [https://www.pse.pl/web/pse-eng/data PSE]
Line 105:		Line 105:
	\|\| Medium		\|\| Medium
	\|\| F1 50% - F2 50% - F3 20% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 50% / I1 100% - I2 80% - I3 80% / R1.1 20% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100%.		\|\| F1 50% - F2 50% - F3 20% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 50% / I1 100% - I2 80% - I3 80% / R1.1 20% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100%.
	\|\| ~~''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?''~~ Taxonomy		\|\| Taxonomy
	\|\| ~~''How are metadata implemented? As~~ xls, csv, pdf, etc.''		\|\| xls, csv, pdf, etc.''
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://transparency.entsoe.eu/ ENTSO-E Transparency Platform]		\| [https://transparency.entsoe.eu/ ENTSO-E Transparency Platform]

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:48, 3 June 2020
Line 91:		Line 91:
	\|\| Rich		\|\| Rich
	\|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 100% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 100% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 100%		\|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 100% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 100% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 100%
	\|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' ~~taxonomy~~		\|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' Taxonomy
	\|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, json, jupyter		\|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, json, jupyter
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://www.eia.gov/ EIA] \|\| Administrative 80%, descriptive 100%, structural 100% \|\| Rich \|\| F1 ~~100~~% - F2 ~~100~~% - F3 ~~100~~% - F4 70% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 ~~100~~% - A2 ~~100~~%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 70% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100% \|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' ~~taxonomy~~ \|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, text, PDF		\| [https://www.eia.gov/ EIA]
			\|\| Administrative 80%, descriptive 100%, structural 100%
			\|\| Rich
			\|\| F1 50% - F2 50% - F3 30% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 50%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 50% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100%
			\|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' Taxonomy
			\|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, text, PDF
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://openei.org/ OpenEI] \|\| Administrative 80%, descriptive 100%, structural 100% \|\| Medium \|\| F1 50% - F2 70% - F3 70% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 50% - A2 50%/ I1 50% - I2 50% - I3 100% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100% \|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' taxonomy \|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, text, PDF		\| [https://openei.org/ OpenEI] \|\| Administrative 80%, descriptive 100%, structural 100% \|\| Medium \|\| F1 50% - F2 70% - F3 70% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 50% - A2 50%/ I1 50% - I2 50% - I3 100% / R1.1 100% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100% \|\| ''What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology?'' taxonomy \|\| ''How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.'' xml, csv, text, PDF

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:52, 3 June 2020
Line 13:		Line 13:
	\|\| The database is an outcome of the Open Energy Modelling Initiative that dates back to 2014. The aim is to construct an open platform for energy systems modelling data.		\|\| The database is an outcome of the Open Energy Modelling Initiative that dates back to 2014. The aim is to construct an open platform for energy systems modelling data.
	\|\| It is an extensive dataset that almost meets FAIR criteria.		\|\| It is an extensive dataset that almost meets FAIR criteria.
	\|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 100% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 100% / R1.1 ~~100~~% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 100%		\|\| F1 100% - F2 100% - F3 100% - F4 100% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 100%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 100% / R1.1 50% - R1.2 100% - R1.3 100%
	\|\| ''What FAIR/O target was decided?'' Improve I2 for using vocabularies that follow FAIR principles		\|\| ''What FAIR/O target was decided?'' Improve I2 for using vocabularies that follow FAIR principles
	* Findable: It is Ok.		* Findable: It is Ok.
	* Accessibility: Improve A2, e.g. no information regarding if metadata are accessible even when the data are no longer available. Also, there is no authentication and authorization procedure, where necessary.		* Accessibility: Improve A2, e.g. no information regarding if metadata are accessible even when the data are no longer available. Also, there is no authentication and authorization procedure, where necessary.
	* Interoperability: It is OK.		* Interoperability: It is OK.
	* Reusability: It is OK.		* Reusability: Improve R1.1, clarify licensing issue regarding different data origins. Notice that OPSD is not owner of the data.
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://www.eia.gov/ EIA]		\| [https://www.eia.gov/ EIA]
	\|\| The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) collects, analyzes, and disseminates independent and impartial energy information to promote sound policymaking, efficient markets, and public understanding of energy and its interaction with the economy and the environment.		\|\| The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) collects, analyzes, and disseminates independent and impartial energy information to promote sound policymaking, efficient markets, and public understanding of energy and its interaction with the economy and the environment.
	\|\| It is an extensive dataset that almost meets FAIR criteria.		\|\| It is an extensive dataset that almost meets FAIR criteria.
	\|\| F1 50% - F2 50% - F3 30% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 50%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 50% / R1.1 ~~100~~% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100%		\|\| F1 50% - F2 50% - F3 30% - F4 50% / A1.1 100% - A1.2 20% - A2 50%/ I1 100% - I2 100% - I3 50% / R1.1 50% - R1.2 50% - R1.3 100%
	\|\| ''What FAIR/O target was decided?''		\|\| ''What FAIR/O target was decided?''
	* Findable: Improve F1,F2,F4, e.g needs unique identifier		* Findable: Improve F1,F2,F4, e.g needs unique identifier
	* Accessibility: Improve A2, e.g. no information regarding if metadata are accessible even when the data are no longer available. Also, there is no authentication and authorization procedure, where necessary.		* Accessibility: Improve A2, e.g. no information regarding if metadata are accessible even when the data are no longer available. Also, there is no authentication and authorization procedure, where necessary.
	* Interoperability: Improve I2, e.g. to include qualified references to other (meta)data		* Interoperability: Improve I2, e.g. to include qualified references to other (meta)data
	* Reusability: improve R1.2. it is not clear how (meta)data are associated with detailed provenance.		* Reusability: improve R1.2. it is not clear how (meta)data are associated with detailed provenance. Improve R1.1, clarify licensing issue regarding different data origins.
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://openei.org/wiki/Main_Page/ OpenEI]		\| [https://openei.org/wiki/Main_Page/ OpenEI]
Line 62:		Line 62:
	* Accessibility: Improve A2: not sure, no information regarding if metadata are accessible even when the data are no longer available.		* Accessibility: Improve A2: not sure, no information regarding if metadata are accessible even when the data are no longer available.
	* Interoperability: Improve I3: data should include qualified references to other data (which TSO or national authority are the main reference?). Also improve I2: There is a long list of databases under sitemap, this can be linked also explanations.		* Interoperability: Improve I3: data should include qualified references to other data (which TSO or national authority are the main reference?). Also improve I2: There is a long list of databases under sitemap, this can be linked also explanations.
	* Reusability: improve R1.1 and R1.2: it should contain more clear and accessible data usage license and associated provenance. regarding license, there is only information in pdf. under “terms and conditions” it states not sub-licensable or transferrable.		* Reusability: improve R1.1 and R1.2: it should contain more clear and accessible data usage license and associated provenance. regarding license, there is only information in pdf. under “terms and conditions” it states not sub-licensable or transferrable. It needs to clarify licensing issue regarding different data origins.
	\|-		\|-
	\| [https://www.smard.de/en/ SMARD (Strommarktdaten)]		\| [https://www.smard.de/en/ SMARD (Strommarktdaten)]