Talk:WS1UC4 - Revision history

Mariab: /* General conclusions from the discussion */

2020-07-21T08:21:38Z

General conclusions from the discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:21, 21 July 2020
Line 13:		Line 13:


	==== General conclusions from the ~~discoussion~~ ====		==== General conclusions from the discussion ====
	* In ideal database all country names would be linked to official registry. Informations should be easily available automatically including ISO code for the country.		* In ideal database all country names would be linked to official registry. Informations should be easily available automatically including ISO code for the country.
	* It is important to know if the database is primary or secondary source - who is a creator of the data. All copies of documents can be available in many places, but it's important to inlclude information about "originals".		* It is important to know if the database is primary or secondary source - who is a creator of the data. All copies of documents can be available in many places, but it's important to inlclude information about "originals".
Line 22:		Line 22:
	* If databases have publishable API, then information should be available.		* If databases have publishable API, then information should be available.
	* Every entry has its provenence, with information how and when the entry has been changed. Basically all entries should have their own metadata.		* Every entry has its provenence, with information how and when the entry has been changed. Basically all entries should have their own metadata.


	==== Identified problems: ====		==== Identified problems: ====
	* How to align the wording and taxonomy in the different languages context?		* How to align the wording and taxonomy in the different languages context?
	* There is no clear information in the Mark Wilkinson system: can we go on a higher rating level if the database not reached the previous level. As a solution, to each level of the Mark Wilkinson system we referred during the databases evaluation.		* There is no clear information in the Mark Wilkinson system: can we go on a higher rating level if the database not reached the previous level. As a solution, to each level of the Mark Wilkinson system we referred during the databases evaluation.

Mariab at 09:03, 11 June 2020

2020-06-11T09:03:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:03, 11 June 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==~~Notes~~ from the discussion==		==Extra notes from the discussion==

Mariab at 08:32, 11 June 2020

2020-06-11T08:32:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:32, 11 June 2020
Line 14:		Line 14:

	==== General conclusions from the discoussion ====		==== General conclusions from the discoussion ====
	* In ideal database all country names would be linked to official registry ~~-->then everybody could go for all information~~. ~~Example on country information, which~~ should be easily available automatically including ISO code for the country.		* In ideal database all country names would be linked to official registry. Informations should be easily available automatically including ISO code for the country.
	* It is important to know if the database is primary or secondary source - who is a creator of the data. All copies of documents can be available in many places, but it's important to inlclude information about "originals".		* It is important to know if the database is primary or secondary source - who is a creator of the data. All copies of documents can be available in many places, but it's important to inlclude information about "originals".
	* When is the information about the date of update - should be also a link to the local page (to ensure that there is a possibility to check at the source, if the policy has been already updated).		* When is the information about the date of update - should be also a link to the local page (to ensure that there is a possibility to check at the source, if the policy has been already updated).

Mariab at 08:25, 11 June 2020

2020-06-11T08:25:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:25, 11 June 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Notes from the discussion==		==Notes from the discussion==

Mariab at 08:25, 11 June 2020

2020-06-11T08:25:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:25, 11 June 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Notes from the discussion==		==Notes from the discussion==


	On UC session were presented more information about COMETS database (This is the only database among the [[WS1UC4#Databases_selected\|selected ones]] that is not available online):		On UC session were presented more information about COMETS database (This is the only database among the [[WS1UC4#Databases_selected\|selected ones]] that is not available online):

Mariab at 08:25, 11 June 2020

2020-06-11T08:25:09Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:25, 11 June 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Notes from the ~~discoussion~~==		==Notes from the discussion==

	On UC session were presented more information about COMETS database (This is the only database among the [[WS1UC4#Databases_selected\|selected ones]] that is not available online):		On UC session were presented more information about COMETS database (This is the only database among the [[WS1UC4#Databases_selected\|selected ones]] that is not available online):

Mariab at 08:24, 11 June 2020

2020-06-11T08:24:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:24, 11 June 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~The other~~ [[WS1UC4#Databases_selected\|selected ~~databases~~]]~~, are avaliable~~ online ~~except <u>COMETS</u>.~~		==Notes from the discoussion==
	~~On UC session were presented more information about this database~~:
			On UC session were presented more information about COMETS database (This is the only database among the [[WS1UC4#Databases_selected\|selected ones]] that is not available online):
	* COMETS database is created in a project with the same name.		* COMETS database is created in a project with the same name.
	* COMETS database contains information on collective actions initiatives for the energy transition for EU countries (inter alia, it contains information about more than 6000 energy production units).		* COMETS database contains information on collective actions initiatives for the energy transition for EU countries (inter alia, it contains information about more than 6000 energy production units).

Mariab at 15:28, 10 June 2020

2020-06-10T15:28:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 10 June 2020
Line 23:		Line 23:
	==== Identified problems: ====		==== Identified problems: ====
	* How to align the wording and taxonomy in the different languages context?		* How to align the wording and taxonomy in the different languages context?
	* There is no clear information in the Mark Wilkinson system: can ~~you~~ go on a higher rating level if the database ~~has~~ not reached the previous level. As a solution, each level of the Mark Wilkinson system ~~was~~ referred to during the databases evaluation.		* There is no clear information in the Mark Wilkinson system: can we go on a higher rating level if the database not reached the previous level. As a solution, to each level of the Mark Wilkinson system we referred during the databases evaluation.

Mariab at 15:25, 10 June 2020

2020-06-10T15:25:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:25, 10 June 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The other [[WS1UC4#Databases_selected\|selected databases]], are avaliable online except <u>COMETS</u>.		The other [[WS1UC4#Databases_selected\|selected databases]], are avaliable online except <u>COMETS</u>.
	On UC session ~~Jan Zeiss~~ presented more information about this database:		On UC session were presented more information about this database:
	* COMETS database is created in a project with the same name.		* COMETS database is created in a project with the same name.
	* COMETS database contains information on collective actions initiatives for the energy transition for EU countries (inter alia, it contains information about more than 6000 energy production units).		* COMETS database contains information on collective actions initiatives for the energy transition for EU countries (inter alia, it contains information about more than 6000 energy production units).

Mariab at 13:33, 10 June 2020

2020-06-10T13:33:44Z

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-* Perhaps, we should decide initially, if we want to only focus on databases that actually contain information on policies or if we want to include databases that include information that is not directly related to policies, but can provide information that is useful for the development of policies? E.g. The COMETS database does not contain information on policies directly, but the information contained in the COMETS database could be valuable for policy development.
+The other [[WS1UC4#Databases_selected|selected databases]], are avaliable online except <u>COMETS</u>.
+On UC session Jan Zeiss presented more information about this database:
 * COMETS database is created in a project with the same name.
 * COMETS database contains information on collective actions initiatives for the energy transition for EU countries (inter alia, it contains information about more than 6000 energy production units).
@@ Line 40: / Line 10: @@
-* Discoussion about Mark Wilkinson system and Mons system of assessing FAIR features:
+==== General conclusions  from the discoussion ====
-In the Mark Willkinson system there is no clear information that can we go furter with the level of assessment if the database didn’t pass the previous one. With a Mons system there is no doubt like this.
+* In ideal database all country names would be linked to official registry -->then everybody could go for all information. Example on country information, which should be easily available automatically including ISO code for the country.
-* Importance of formats of data. It is important that the format of the data to be entered in specific entry is strictly defined (example - the date: need of clear definitions - what's to include: year, month, day specific?) Similarly - with longitude, latitute. If it's not done in advance, later on it takes much work to manually change it and put into right format. On the other hand - potentially - making a very specific description - may exclude some data, which are available but in different standards - for ecxample between EU and American standards.
+==== Identified problems: ====
-* Every entry has its provenence, with information how the entry hhas been changed, when, etc. Basically all entries should have their own metadata.
+* How to align the wording and taxonomy in the different languages context?