Talk:UC4 - Revision history

Małgorzatam: /* COMETS discussion */

2020-06-03T14:02:16Z

COMETS discussion

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:02, 3 June 2020
Line 14:		Line 14:
	* if metadata doesn't provide the possibility of reachning the sources (if the documents are there, but you don't have an opportunity to get to the official, legal document).		* if metadata doesn't provide the possibility of reachning the sources (if the documents are there, but you don't have an opportunity to get to the official, legal document).

	==== COMETS discussion ====		==== COMETS project database discussion ====
	* COllective action Models for Energy Transition and Social Innovation		* COllective action Models for Energy Transition and Social Innovation (COMETS) project - H2020
	* information for collective actions (CAIs) for all EU countries, most importantly - for countries being in energy transition.		* information for collective actions (CAIs) for all EU countries, most importantly - for countries being in energy transition.
	* 3700 initiatives in selected European countries - Germany, Belgium, Czechia, Switzerland,		* 3700 initiatives in selected European countries - Germany, Belgium, Czechia, Switzerland,

Małgorzatam: /* COMETS */

2020-06-03T14:01:47Z

COMETS

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:01, 3 June 2020
Line 14:		Line 14:
	* if metadata doesn't provide the possibility of reachning the sources (if the documents are there, but you don't have an opportunity to get to the official, legal document).		* if metadata doesn't provide the possibility of reachning the sources (if the documents are there, but you don't have an opportunity to get to the official, legal document).

	==== COMETS ====		==== COMETS discussion ====
	* information for collective actions for all EU countries, most importantly - for countries being in energy transition.		* COllective action Models for Energy Transition and Social Innovation
			* information for collective actions (CAIs) for all EU countries, most importantly - for countries being in energy transition.
	* 3700 initiatives in selected European countries - Germany, Belgium, Czechia, Switzerland,		* 3700 initiatives in selected European countries - Germany, Belgium, Czechia, Switzerland,
	* based on the internet desk research, business registers, etc.		* based on the internet desk research, business registers, etc.
Line 21:		Line 22:
	* within the project in six countries (DE, ES, BE, PL, EE) they are conducting servey about the development and values (export, import). The data from it will be also included into the databse/.		* within the project in six countries (DE, ES, BE, PL, EE) they are conducting servey about the development and values (export, import). The data from it will be also included into the databse/.
	* as it's still under development - FAIRness is 0% for now.		* as it's still under development - FAIRness is 0% for now.
	* from COMETS project perspective, an important step for FAIRification is to facilitate by categorisation, what and how specific activities are currently being implemented in different countries, categorisation of them, taxonomy.		* from COMETS project perspective, an important step for FAIRification is to facilitate by categorisation, what and how specific activities are currently being implemented in different countries, categorisation of them, taxonomy.

	==== General conclusions ====		==== General conclusions ====

Małgorzatam: /* IEA Policy database */

2020-06-03T14:00:45Z

IEA Policy database

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:00, 3 June 2020
Line 5:		Line 5:
	# EUR-Lex		# EUR-Lex

	==== IEA Policy database ====		==== IEA Policy database discussion ====

	* preliminary assessment of level of implementation of FAIR/O principles: F4 - yes; A1 - yes, A2 - yes (only depends on EU policy); I1 - yes; I2 - fulfilled, I3 - fulfilled; R1.1 - yes; R1.2 - no; R1.3 - not fulfilled, not even the DC standards.		* preliminary assessment of level of implementation of FAIR/O principles: F4 - yes; A1 - yes, A2 - yes (only depends on EU policy); I1 - yes; I2 - fulfilled, I3 - fulfilled; R1.1 - yes; R1.2 - no; R1.3 - not fulfilled, not even the DC standards.

Małgorzatam: /* directions in building taxonomy */

2020-06-03T14:00:25Z

directions in building taxonomy

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:00, 3 June 2020
Line 37:		Line 37:
	2) policy perspective / the level of goverment (for whom it's developed = local regional, national, international level, etc)		2) policy perspective / the level of goverment (for whom it's developed = local regional, national, international level, etc)

	==== ~~directions in~~ building ~~taxonomy~~ ====		==== Taxonomy building ====
	* Example to be watched: EU taxonomy for green innovation companies		* Example to be watched: EU taxonomy for green innovation companies
	* UC4 taxomnomy needs to match to higher level = overall level of the projects. To make sure, that the complete taxonomy is		* UC4 taxomnomy needs to match to higher level = overall level of the projects. To make sure, that the complete taxonomy is

Małgorzatam at 13:59, 3 June 2020

2020-06-03T13:59:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 3 June 2020
Line 7:		Line 7:
	==== IEA Policy database ====		==== IEA Policy database ====

	~~Level~~ of implementation of FAIR/O principles: F4 - yes; A1 - yes, A2 - yes (only depends on EU policy); I1 - yes; I2 - fulfilled, I3 - fulfilled; R1.1 - yes; R1.2 - no; R1.3 - not fulfilled, not even the DC standards.		* preliminary assessment of level of implementation of FAIR/O principles: F4 - yes; A1 - yes, A2 - yes (only depends on EU policy); I1 - yes; I2 - fulfilled, I3 - fulfilled; R1.1 - yes; R1.2 - no; R1.3 - not fulfilled, not even the DC standards.
	* Metadate seems to be spread.		* Metadate seems to be spread.
	* ~~August -~~ example: In ideal database all country names would be linked to official registry --> you could go for all information. It would be 100% FAIR. Are any bases like that?		* Discussion on understanding of 100% fulfillement, on the example: In ideal database all country names would be linked to official registry --> you could go for all information. It would be 100% FAIR. Are any bases like that? Example on country information, which should be easily available automatically, for example ISO code for the country. IEA policy database is not fully like that.
	* ~~Difficulties~~ even in defining "policy" = everything (every official document) which is published in official governmental page.		* difficulties even in defining "policy" = everything (every official document) which is published in official governmental page.
	* testing on the example of Poland and National Energy Efficency Action Plan for Poland: link to the official governmental page, not the direct link to the official document or to the official country law. When information about the date of update - should be also a linked to the local page (to ensure that the is a ~~spossibility~~ to ~~chacke~~ at the source, if the policy has been already updated.		* testing on the example of Poland and National Energy Efficency Action Plan for Poland: link to the official governmental page, not the direct link to the official document or to the official country law. When information about the date of update - should be also a linked to the local page (to ensure that the is a possibility to check at the source, if the policy has been already updated.
	* if metadata doesn't provide the		* if metadata doesn't provide the possibility of reachning the sources (if the documents are there, but you don't have an opportunity to get to the official, legal document).
	if the documents are there, but you don't have an ~~oppurtunity~~ to get to the official, legal document.

	==== COMETS ====		==== COMETS ====
Line 26:		Line 25:
	==== General conclusions ====		==== General conclusions ====

	* discussion on Wilkinson FAIR priniciples --> if there are any databases which are 100% in accordance to these principles. 100% is an utopia		* discussion on Wilkinson FAIR priniciples --> if there are any databases which are 100% in accordance to these principles. 100% is an utopia. We only can make a hierarchy, which databases are matching these citerias better, or worse.
	We only can make a hierarchy, which databases are matching these citerias better, or worse.		* in Mons system - it's more clear that you have to achieve specific level, to be able to go further.
	* in Mons system it's more clear that you have to achieve specific level, to be able to go further.

	* ~~August example~~: ~~database with country information, which should be easily available automatically, for example ISO code for the country. IEA policy database is not fully like that.~~		* two possible approaches: (1) start of absolute lowest datasets and try to FAIRify those, and later on move "up". (2) on the other hand FAIRification of database which are more complex is leading us to results / conlcussions available also for less complicated databases.
	* start of absolute lowest datasets and try to FAIRify those, and later on move "up".
	* FAIRification of database which are more complex is leading us to results / conlcussions available also for less complicated databases.

	* important ~~- what~~ format ~~it's possible~~ to ~~include for~~ specific entry~~. As~~ example - the date ~~(you have to have~~ clear definitions - what's ~~date. -~~ year, month, day specific? ) Similarly - with longitude, latitute. If ~~you don~~'~~t do it~~ in advance, later on it takes much work to manually change it and put into right format. On the other hand - potentially - ~~makinf~~ a very specific description - may exclude some data, which are available but in different standards - for ecxample between EU and American standards.		* importance of formats of data. It is important that the format of the data to be entered in specific entry is strictly defined (example - the date: need of clear definitions - what's to include: year, month, day specific?) Similarly - with longitude, latitute. If it's not done in advance, later on it takes much work to manually change it and put into right format. On the other hand - potentially - making a very specific description - may exclude some data, which are available but in different standards - for ecxample between EU and American standards.
	* every entry has ~~it's~~ provenence, with information how the entry hhas been changed, when, etc. Basically all entries should have their own metadata.		* every entry has its provenence, with information how the entry hhas been changed, when, etc. Basically all entries should have their own metadata.

	* two dimensions of policies:		* two dimensions of policies:
	1) policy domain (topic of the policy)		1) policy domain (topic of the policy)
	2) policy perspective / the level of goverment (for whom it's developed = local regional, national, international level, etc)		2) policy perspective / the level of goverment (for whom it's developed = local regional, national, international level, etc)

	* much focus is put on energy citizenship, participatorey of inclusiveness of policy process

	==== directions in building taxonomy ====		==== directions in building taxonomy ====

Małgorzatam at 12:58, 3 June 2020

2020-06-03T12:58:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:58, 3 June 2020
Line 37:		Line 37:
	* every entry has it's provenence, with information how the entry hhas been changed, when, etc. Basically all entries should have their own metadata.		* every entry has it's provenence, with information how the entry hhas been changed, when, etc. Basically all entries should have their own metadata.

	* two dimensions of policies: 1) policy domain (topic of the policy)		* two dimensions of policies:
			1) policy domain (topic of the policy)
	2) policy perspective / the level of goverment (for whom it's developed = local regional, national, international level, etc)		2) policy perspective / the level of goverment (for whom it's developed = local regional, national, international level, etc)


	* much focus is put on energy citizenship, participatorey of inclusiveness of policy process		* much focus is put on energy citizenship, participatorey of inclusiveness of policy process

Małgorzatam: /* General conclusions */

2020-06-03T12:57:55Z

General conclusions

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:57, 3 June 2020
Line 37:		Line 37:
	* every entry has it's provenence, with information how the entry hhas been changed, when, etc. Basically all entries should have their own metadata.		* every entry has it's provenence, with information how the entry hhas been changed, when, etc. Basically all entries should have their own metadata.

	* two dimensions of policies:		* two dimensions of policies: 1) policy domain (topic of the policy)
	1) policy domain (topic of the policy)
	2) policy perspective / the level of goverment (for whom it's developed = local regional, national, international level, etc)		2) policy perspective / the level of goverment (for whom it's developed = local regional, national, international level, etc)


	* much focus is put on energy citizenship, participatorey of inclusiveness of policy process		* much focus is put on energy citizenship, participatorey of inclusiveness of policy process



	==== directions in building taxonomy ====		==== directions in building taxonomy ====

Małgorzatam at 12:57, 3 June 2020

2020-06-03T12:57:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:57, 3 June 2020
Line 47:		Line 47:

	==== directions in building taxonomy ====		==== directions in building taxonomy ====
	EU taxonomy for green innovation companies		* Example to be watched: EU taxonomy for green innovation companies
			* UC4 taxomnomy needs to match to higher level = overall level of the projects. To make sure, that the complete taxonomy is
	~~# starting on agreement of keywords + building the glossry~~
	It needs to match to higher level = overall level of the projects. To make sure, that the complete taxonomy is

			Proposed logical aspects / steps:
			# starting on agreement of keywords + the glossry, to ensure common understanding.
	# taking into consideration two dimensions of policies: (1) policy domain and (2) policy level of goverment		# taking into consideration two dimensions of policies: (1) policy domain and (2) policy level of goverment
	# coordinationg with other use cses: UC4 is affecting other use cases, so our keywords should not only match, but sometimes should be even taken from other use cases.		# coordinationg with other use cses: UC4 is affecting other use cases, so our keywords should not only match, but sometimes should be even taken from other use cases.

Małgorzatam at 12:55, 3 June 2020

2020-06-03T12:55:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:55, 3 June 2020
Line 36:		Line 36:
	* important - what format it's possible to include for specific entry. As example - the date (you have to have clear definitions - what's date. - year, month, day specific? ) Similarly - with longitude, latitute. If you don't do it in advance, later on it takes much work to manually change it and put into right format. On the other hand - potentially - makinf a very specific description - may exclude some data, which are available but in different standards - for ecxample between EU and American standards.		* important - what format it's possible to include for specific entry. As example - the date (you have to have clear definitions - what's date. - year, month, day specific? ) Similarly - with longitude, latitute. If you don't do it in advance, later on it takes much work to manually change it and put into right format. On the other hand - potentially - makinf a very specific description - may exclude some data, which are available but in different standards - for ecxample between EU and American standards.
	* every entry has it's provenence, with information how the entry hhas been changed, when, etc. Basically all entries should have their own metadata.		* every entry has it's provenence, with information how the entry hhas been changed, when, etc. Basically all entries should have their own metadata.

			* two dimensions of policies:
			1) policy domain (topic of the policy)
			2) policy perspective / the level of goverment (for whom it's developed = local regional, national, international level, etc)


			* much focus is put on energy citizenship, participatorey of inclusiveness of policy process



Line 41:		Line 49:
	EU taxonomy for green innovation companies		EU taxonomy for green innovation companies

	# ~~first step -~~ starting on agreement of keywords + building the glossry		# starting on agreement of keywords + building the glossry
	It needs to match to higher level = overall level of the projects. To make sure, that the complete taxonomy is		It needs to match to higher level = overall level of the projects. To make sure, that the complete taxonomy is

	* two dimensions of policies: 1) policy domain 2) policy ~~perspective (for whom it's developed = local regional, national~~ level~~, etc)~~		# taking into consideration two dimensions of policies: (1) policy domain and (2) policy level of goverment
	#		# coordinationg with other use cses: UC4 is affecting other use cases, so our keywords should not only match, but sometimes should be even taken from other use cases.

Małgorzatam at 12:48, 3 June 2020

2020-06-03T12:48:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:48, 3 June 2020
Line 41:		Line 41:
	EU taxonomy for green innovation companies		EU taxonomy for green innovation companies

	# first step - starting on agreement of keywords + building the glossry		# first step - starting on agreement of keywords + building the glossry
			It needs to match to higher level = overall level of the projects. To make sure, that the complete taxonomy is

			* two dimensions of policies: 1) policy domain 2) policy perspective (for whom it's developed = local regional, national level, etc)
	#		#