EERAdata Wiki - User contributions [en]

WS3

2021-09-28T13:33:13Z

Mariuszk: /* Agenda - 13 October: 13.30-17.30 */

'''Workshop N.3: "FAIRification put into practice - a joint workshop by EERAdata and the tJP Digitalization for Energy"'''

We are happy to announce that EERAdata jointly organizes the 3rd EERAdata workshop toghether with the [https://www.eera-set.eu/ EERA] tJP "[https://www.eera-set.eu/component/projects/projects.html?id=183 Digitalization for energy]" as part of their annual conference. The workshop is organized with online webinars and hands-on sessions between 12 and 14 October 2021. Data interoperability and workflows are recurrent themes of all workshop sessions.

== Objectives ==
* Present activities of the tJP Digitalization for Energy - From FAIR data governance to AI applications and Exascale computing
* Discuss and develop workflows for large-scale FAIR and open (simulation) data
* Synthesize community insights and formulate action points

== Read & watch aheads ==
In order to meet the WS3 objectives and to prepare for the paper writing hackathon, please have a look to:
* [[Preparatory workshop]] on the 6th July 2021, agenda and presentations
* Google doc working document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C7LKTGi_Cm2_oFZOIb5d8axdlrWIU7iw7RN5rqZ8RoQ/edit

== Agenda - 12 October: 14.00-16.00 ==
Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data:
* Who are the communities in EERA working on data governance, HPC, and AI applications?
* What are current topics of interest?
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Massimo Celino
|-
| 14:00 || Welcome and introduction || Giorgio Graditi || ENEA
|-
| 14:20 || The EU energy policy context || Vincent Berrutto || DG ENER, Unit Innovation, research, competitiveness, and digitalisation
|-
| 14:40 || The EERA vision for a Clean Energy Transition || Adel El Gammal || EERA
|-
| 15:00 || EERA DfE: Maximizing the impact of digitalisation as a cross-cutting activity within EERA || Rafael Mayo Garcia || CIEMAT
|-
| 15:20 || '''Break''' ||
|-
| 15.40 || SP1 (EoCoE): Toward exascale for a clean and decarbonized energy || Edouard Audit || CEA
|-
| 16:00 || SP2 (EERAdata): Machine-actionable data as a prerequisite for AI-applications || Valeria Jana Schwanitz || HVL
|-
| 16:20 || AI + FAIR for Energy || Tbd ||
|-
| 16:40 || Enabling dynamic and intelligent workflows in the future EuroHPC ecosystem || Rosa M Badia || BSC
|-
|}

== Agenda - 13 October: 09.00-12.15 ==

Continuation "Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data":
* Who are the communities in EERA working on data governance, AI applications, and HPC?
* What are current topics of interest?
* Insights from projects & presentations of use case examples

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| Perspectives on HPC and data: EERA tJP challenges
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Rafael Mayo Garcia
|-
| 09:00 || Towards an energy data space - the FEEDS project idea || Tbd || FEEDS consortium
|-
| 09:30 || Digitalization in nuclear materials research: facts and challenges || Marjorie Bertolus || CEA and SP Nuclear Matter
|-
| 09:45 || The role of digitalization at the development of sustainable hydropower || Eduard Doujak || TU Wien and SP Hydro
|-
| 10:00 || Seeking for new/improved materials for energy transition, impact of HPC and digitalization use || David Lacroix || Lorraine Univ and SP AMPEA
|-
| 10:15 || Digitalisation challenges for an effective Energy Systems Integration || Peter Breuhaus || Norce Research and SP ESI
|-
| 10:30 || ENTENTE – Defining and implementing a European Database for Multiscale Modelling || Marta Serrano Garcia || CIEMAT
|-
| 10.45 || The EERAdata platform - ideas for tools and services|| Astrid Unger || AIT and EERAdata
|-
| 11:00 || '''Break''' ||
|-
!colspan="6"| Perspectives on workflows and interoperable data: EERAdata Use Cases
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Valeria Jana Schwanitz
|-
| 11:15 || FAIRification challenges: Evidence from real life implementations || Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu || IUE, UC1 "Buildings Efficiency"
|-
| 11:30 || FAIRification put into practice - The code of the FAIR COMETS inventory on energy communities across Europe || August Wierling || HVL, UC2 "Energy Markets"
|-
| 11:45 || Experiences with establishing workflows for the material science database || Massimo Celino || ENEA, UC3 "Materials for energy"
|-
| 12:00 || Challenges in implementing FAIR principles in energy policy domain || Mariusz Kruczek || GIG, UC4 "Energy and energy efficiency policies"
|-
|}

== Agenda - 13 October: 13.30-17.30 ==
EERAdata hands-on!

The afternoon is organized in a slot with two breakout groups, followed by two plenaries.

'''13.30-15.00 Parallel breakout groups''' (BOG):

BOG organized by UC1 "Buildings efficiency". Format: Presentations, Q&A and discussion. Agenda with speakers and topics to follow.

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIR data challenges in Individual level data:
Cases and evidences from H2020 Projects
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderator: Prof. Dr. Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu, Izmir University of Economics, Turkey
|-
|
* Dr. Andrea Kollmann, Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Austria
* Dr. Johannes Reichl, Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Austria
|-
!colspan="6"| Discussant: Dr. Muhittin Hakan Demir, Izmir University of Economics, Turkey
|-
|}

Technical BOG "FAIRIfication in practice: Discussing solutions for technical challenges - integrating standards, supporting workflows". Organized by UC2 "Energy Markets" and UC3 "Material for energy". Format: Addressing in group discussion identified technical issues.

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIRIfication in practice:
Discussing solutions for technical challenges - integrating standards, supporting workflows
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderator: TbD
|-
|
* UC2 "Energy Markets"
* UC3 "Material for energy"
|-
!colspan="6"| Discussant: TbD
|-
|}

''Break of 30 min''

'''15.30-16.15 Collecting feedback from data users and stakeholders''' (to prepare a draft to survey user interests) organized by UC 4 "Energy and energy efficiency policies" (GIG team)
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIR data challenges in energy and energy efficiency policies
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderators: Małgorzata Markowska, Aleksandra Zgórska, GIG, Katowice
|-
|
Disscusion questions:
* What data related to energy policies are you looking for?
* Which strategy to search for data related to energy policies do you use?
* How do you use data extracted from energy policy databases?
* What are the expectations regarding the content of databases on energy policies?
* What would facilitate the use of data contained in energy policy databases?
|-
!colspan="6"| Main outcome: Recommendations for the community survey
|-
|}

''Break of 15 min''

'''16.30-17.30 Conclusions for the EERAdata platform: Which FAIR data services and tools to offer?''' organized by WP3 (AIT team)

== Agenda - 14 October: 09.00-12.30 ==
EERAdata hands-on!

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! !! Title !! Moderator
|-
| 09:00 || Discussion across use cases: How to advance the state of FAIR in the use cases? What are the plans for uploading use cases demos to the European Open Science Cloud? || Use case leaders
|-
| 11:30 || Plenary to wrap up discussions - how to continue working on the paper and how to prepare the 4th EERAdata workshop|| Valeria Jana Schwanitz
|-
|}

WS3

2021-09-28T13:30:48Z

Mariuszk: /* Agenda - 13 October: 13.30-17.30 */

'''Workshop N.3: "FAIRification put into practice - a joint workshop by EERAdata and the tJP Digitalization for Energy"'''

We are happy to announce that EERAdata jointly organizes the 3rd EERAdata workshop toghether with the [https://www.eera-set.eu/ EERA] tJP "[https://www.eera-set.eu/component/projects/projects.html?id=183 Digitalization for energy]" as part of their annual conference. The workshop is organized with online webinars and hands-on sessions between 12 and 14 October 2021. Data interoperability and workflows are recurrent themes of all workshop sessions.

== Objectives ==
* Present activities of the tJP Digitalization for Energy - From FAIR data governance to AI applications and Exascale computing
* Discuss and develop workflows for large-scale FAIR and open (simulation) data
* Synthesize community insights and formulate action points

== Read & watch aheads ==
In order to meet the WS3 objectives and to prepare for the paper writing hackathon, please have a look to:
* [[Preparatory workshop]] on the 6th July 2021, agenda and presentations
* Google doc working document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C7LKTGi_Cm2_oFZOIb5d8axdlrWIU7iw7RN5rqZ8RoQ/edit

== Agenda - 12 October: 14.00-16.00 ==
Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data:
* Who are the communities in EERA working on data governance, HPC, and AI applications?
* What are current topics of interest?
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Massimo Celino
|-
| 14:00 || Welcome and introduction || Giorgio Graditi || ENEA
|-
| 14:20 || The EU energy policy context || Vincent Berrutto || DG ENER, Unit Innovation, research, competitiveness, and digitalisation
|-
| 14:40 || The EERA vision for a Clean Energy Transition || Adel El Gammal || EERA
|-
| 15:00 || EERA DfE: Maximizing the impact of digitalisation as a cross-cutting activity within EERA || Rafael Mayo Garcia || CIEMAT
|-
| 15:20 || '''Break''' ||
|-
| 15.40 || SP1 (EoCoE): Toward exascale for a clean and decarbonized energy || Edouard Audit || CEA
|-
| 16:00 || SP2 (EERAdata): Machine-actionable data as a prerequisite for AI-applications || Valeria Jana Schwanitz || HVL
|-
| 16:20 || AI + FAIR for Energy || Tbd ||
|-
| 16:40 || Enabling dynamic and intelligent workflows in the future EuroHPC ecosystem || Rosa M Badia || BSC
|-
|}

== Agenda - 13 October: 09.00-12.15 ==

Continuation "Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data":
* Who are the communities in EERA working on data governance, AI applications, and HPC?
* What are current topics of interest?
* Insights from projects & presentations of use case examples

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| Perspectives on HPC and data: EERA tJP challenges
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Rafael Mayo Garcia
|-
| 09:00 || Towards an energy data space - the FEEDS project idea || Tbd || FEEDS consortium
|-
| 09:30 || Digitalization in nuclear materials research: facts and challenges || Marjorie Bertolus || CEA and SP Nuclear Matter
|-
| 09:45 || The role of digitalization at the development of sustainable hydropower || Eduard Doujak || TU Wien and SP Hydro
|-
| 10:00 || Seeking for new/improved materials for energy transition, impact of HPC and digitalization use || David Lacroix || Lorraine Univ and SP AMPEA
|-
| 10:15 || Digitalisation challenges for an effective Energy Systems Integration || Peter Breuhaus || Norce Research and SP ESI
|-
| 10:30 || ENTENTE – Defining and implementing a European Database for Multiscale Modelling || Marta Serrano Garcia || CIEMAT
|-
| 10.45 || The EERAdata platform - ideas for tools and services|| Astrid Unger || AIT and EERAdata
|-
| 11:00 || '''Break''' ||
|-
!colspan="6"| Perspectives on workflows and interoperable data: EERAdata Use Cases
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Valeria Jana Schwanitz
|-
| 11:15 || FAIRification challenges: Evidence from real life implementations || Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu || IUE, UC1 "Buildings Efficiency"
|-
| 11:30 || FAIRification put into practice - The code of the FAIR COMETS inventory on energy communities across Europe || August Wierling || HVL, UC2 "Energy Markets"
|-
| 11:45 || Experiences with establishing workflows for the material science database || Massimo Celino || ENEA, UC3 "Materials for energy"
|-
| 12:00 || Challenges in implementing FAIR principles in energy policy domain || Mariusz Kruczek || GIG, UC4 "Energy and energy efficiency policies"
|-
|}

== Agenda - 13 October: 13.30-17.30 ==
EERAdata hands-on!

The afternoon is organized in a slot with two breakout groups, followed by two plenaries.

'''13.30-15.00 Parallel breakout groups''' (BOG):

BOG organized by UC1 "Buildings efficiency". Format: Presentations, Q&A and discussion. Agenda with speakers and topics to follow.

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIR data challenges in Individual level data:
Cases and evidences from H2020 Projects
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderator: Prof. Dr. Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu, Izmir University of Economics, Turkey
|-
|
* Dr. Andrea Kollmann, Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Austria
* Dr. Johannes Reichl, Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Austria
|-
!colspan="6"| Discussant: Dr. Muhittin Hakan Demir, Izmir University of Economics, Turkey
|-
|}

Technical BOG "FAIRIfication in practice: Discussing solutions for technical challenges - integrating standards, supporting workflows". Organized by UC2 "Energy Markets" and UC3 "Material for energy". Format: Addressing in group discussion identified technical issues.

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIRIfication in practice:
Discussing solutions for technical challenges - integrating standards, supporting workflows
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderator: TbD
|-
|
* UC2 "Energy Markets"
* UC3 "Material for energy"
|-
!colspan="6"| Discussant: TbD
|-
|}

''Break of 30 min''

'''15.30-16.15 Collecting feedback from data users and stakeholders''' (to prepare a draft to survey user interests) organized by UC 4 "Energy and energy efficiency policies" (GIG team)
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIR data challenges in energy and energy efficiency policies
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderators: Małgorzata Markowska, Aleksandra Zgórska, GIG, Katowice
|-
|
Disscusion questions:
* What data related to energy policies are you looking for?
* Which strategy to search for data related to energy policies do you use?
* How do you use data extracted from energy policy databases?
* What are the expectations regarding the content of databases on energy policies?
* What would facilitate the use of data contained in energy policy databases?
|-
!colspan="6"|
|-
|}

''Break of 15 min''

'''16.30-17.30 Conclusions for the EERAdata platform: Which FAIR data services and tools to offer?''' organized by WP3 (AIT team)

== Agenda - 14 October: 09.00-12.30 ==
EERAdata hands-on!

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! !! Title !! Moderator
|-
| 09:00 || Discussion across use cases: How to advance the state of FAIR in the use cases? What are the plans for uploading use cases demos to the European Open Science Cloud? || Use case leaders
|-
| 11:30 || Plenary to wrap up discussions - how to continue working on the paper and how to prepare the 4th EERAdata workshop|| Valeria Jana Schwanitz
|-
|}

WS3

2021-09-28T13:30:16Z

Mariuszk: /* Agenda - 13 October: 13.30-17.30 */

'''Workshop N.3: "FAIRification put into practice - a joint workshop by EERAdata and the tJP Digitalization for Energy"'''

We are happy to announce that EERAdata jointly organizes the 3rd EERAdata workshop toghether with the [https://www.eera-set.eu/ EERA] tJP "[https://www.eera-set.eu/component/projects/projects.html?id=183 Digitalization for energy]" as part of their annual conference. The workshop is organized with online webinars and hands-on sessions between 12 and 14 October 2021. Data interoperability and workflows are recurrent themes of all workshop sessions.

== Objectives ==
* Present activities of the tJP Digitalization for Energy - From FAIR data governance to AI applications and Exascale computing
* Discuss and develop workflows for large-scale FAIR and open (simulation) data
* Synthesize community insights and formulate action points

== Read & watch aheads ==
In order to meet the WS3 objectives and to prepare for the paper writing hackathon, please have a look to:
* [[Preparatory workshop]] on the 6th July 2021, agenda and presentations
* Google doc working document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C7LKTGi_Cm2_oFZOIb5d8axdlrWIU7iw7RN5rqZ8RoQ/edit

== Agenda - 12 October: 14.00-16.00 ==
Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data:
* Who are the communities in EERA working on data governance, HPC, and AI applications?
* What are current topics of interest?
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Massimo Celino
|-
| 14:00 || Welcome and introduction || Giorgio Graditi || ENEA
|-
| 14:20 || The EU energy policy context || Vincent Berrutto || DG ENER, Unit Innovation, research, competitiveness, and digitalisation
|-
| 14:40 || The EERA vision for a Clean Energy Transition || Adel El Gammal || EERA
|-
| 15:00 || EERA DfE: Maximizing the impact of digitalisation as a cross-cutting activity within EERA || Rafael Mayo Garcia || CIEMAT
|-
| 15:20 || '''Break''' ||
|-
| 15.40 || SP1 (EoCoE): Toward exascale for a clean and decarbonized energy || Edouard Audit || CEA
|-
| 16:00 || SP2 (EERAdata): Machine-actionable data as a prerequisite for AI-applications || Valeria Jana Schwanitz || HVL
|-
| 16:20 || AI + FAIR for Energy || Tbd ||
|-
| 16:40 || Enabling dynamic and intelligent workflows in the future EuroHPC ecosystem || Rosa M Badia || BSC
|-
|}

== Agenda - 13 October: 09.00-12.15 ==

Continuation "Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data":
* Who are the communities in EERA working on data governance, AI applications, and HPC?
* What are current topics of interest?
* Insights from projects & presentations of use case examples

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| Perspectives on HPC and data: EERA tJP challenges
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Rafael Mayo Garcia
|-
| 09:00 || Towards an energy data space - the FEEDS project idea || Tbd || FEEDS consortium
|-
| 09:30 || Digitalization in nuclear materials research: facts and challenges || Marjorie Bertolus || CEA and SP Nuclear Matter
|-
| 09:45 || The role of digitalization at the development of sustainable hydropower || Eduard Doujak || TU Wien and SP Hydro
|-
| 10:00 || Seeking for new/improved materials for energy transition, impact of HPC and digitalization use || David Lacroix || Lorraine Univ and SP AMPEA
|-
| 10:15 || Digitalisation challenges for an effective Energy Systems Integration || Peter Breuhaus || Norce Research and SP ESI
|-
| 10:30 || ENTENTE – Defining and implementing a European Database for Multiscale Modelling || Marta Serrano Garcia || CIEMAT
|-
| 10.45 || The EERAdata platform - ideas for tools and services|| Astrid Unger || AIT and EERAdata
|-
| 11:00 || '''Break''' ||
|-
!colspan="6"| Perspectives on workflows and interoperable data: EERAdata Use Cases
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Valeria Jana Schwanitz
|-
| 11:15 || FAIRification challenges: Evidence from real life implementations || Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu || IUE, UC1 "Buildings Efficiency"
|-
| 11:30 || FAIRification put into practice - The code of the FAIR COMETS inventory on energy communities across Europe || August Wierling || HVL, UC2 "Energy Markets"
|-
| 11:45 || Experiences with establishing workflows for the material science database || Massimo Celino || ENEA, UC3 "Materials for energy"
|-
| 12:00 || Challenges in implementing FAIR principles in energy policy domain || Mariusz Kruczek || GIG, UC4 "Energy and energy efficiency policies"
|-
|}

== Agenda - 13 October: 13.30-17.30 ==
EERAdata hands-on!

The afternoon is organized in a slot with two breakout groups, followed by two plenaries.

'''13.30-15.00 Parallel breakout groups''' (BOG):

BOG organized by UC1 "Buildings efficiency". Format: Presentations, Q&A and discussion. Agenda with speakers and topics to follow.

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIR data challenges in Individual level data:
Cases and evidences from H2020 Projects
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderator: Prof. Dr. Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu, Izmir University of Economics, Turkey
|-
|
* Dr. Andrea Kollmann, Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Austria
* Dr. Johannes Reichl, Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Austria
|-
!colspan="6"| Discussant: Dr. Muhittin Hakan Demir, Izmir University of Economics, Turkey
|-
|}

Technical BOG "FAIRIfication in practice: Discussing solutions for technical challenges - integrating standards, supporting workflows". Organized by UC2 "Energy Markets" and UC3 "Material for energy". Format: Addressing in group discussion identified technical issues.

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIRIfication in practice:
Discussing solutions for technical challenges - integrating standards, supporting workflows
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderator: TbD
|-
|
* UC2 "Energy Markets"
* UC3 "Material for energy"
|-
!colspan="6"| Discussant: TbD
|-
|}

''Break of 30 min''

'''15.30-16.15 Collecting feedback from data users and stakeholders''' (to prepare a draft to survey user interests) organized by UC 4 "Energy and energy efficiency policies" (GIG team)
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIR data challenges in energy and energy efficiency policies
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderator: Małgorzata Markowska, GIG, Katowice
Aleksandra Zgórska, GIG, Katowice
|-
|
Disscusion questions:
* What data related to energy policies are you looking for?
* Which strategy to search for data related to energy policies do you use?
* How do you use data extracted from energy policy databases?
* What are the expectations regarding the content of databases on energy policies?
* What would facilitate the use of data contained in energy policy databases?
|-
!colspan="6"|
|-
|}

''Break of 15 min''

'''16.30-17.30 Conclusions for the EERAdata platform: Which FAIR data services and tools to offer?''' organized by WP3 (AIT team)

== Agenda - 14 October: 09.00-12.30 ==
EERAdata hands-on!

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! !! Title !! Moderator
|-
| 09:00 || Discussion across use cases: How to advance the state of FAIR in the use cases? What are the plans for uploading use cases demos to the European Open Science Cloud? || Use case leaders
|-
| 11:30 || Plenary to wrap up discussions - how to continue working on the paper and how to prepare the 4th EERAdata workshop|| Valeria Jana Schwanitz
|-
|}

WS3

2021-09-28T13:17:23Z

Mariuszk: /* Agenda - 13 October: 13.30-17.30 */

'''Workshop N.3: "FAIRification put into practice - a joint workshop by EERAdata and the tJP Digitalization for Energy"'''

We are happy to announce that EERAdata jointly organizes the 3rd EERAdata workshop toghether with the [https://www.eera-set.eu/ EERA] tJP "[https://www.eera-set.eu/component/projects/projects.html?id=183 Digitalization for energy]" as part of their annual conference. The workshop is organized with online webinars and hands-on sessions between 12 and 14 October 2021. Data interoperability and workflows are recurrent themes of all workshop sessions.

== Objectives ==
* Present activities of the tJP Digitalization for Energy - From FAIR data governance to AI applications and Exascale computing
* Discuss and develop workflows for large-scale FAIR and open (simulation) data
* Synthesize community insights and formulate action points

== Read & watch aheads ==
In order to meet the WS3 objectives and to prepare for the paper writing hackathon, please have a look to:
* [[Preparatory workshop]] on the 6th July 2021, agenda and presentations
* Google doc working document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C7LKTGi_Cm2_oFZOIb5d8axdlrWIU7iw7RN5rqZ8RoQ/edit

== Agenda - 12 October: 14.00-16.00 ==
Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data:
* Who are the communities in EERA working on data governance, HPC, and AI applications?
* What are current topics of interest?
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Massimo Celino
|-
| 14:00 || Welcome and introduction || Giorgio Graditi || ENEA
|-
| 14:20 || The EU energy policy context || Vincent Berrutto || DG ENER, Unit Innovation, research, competitiveness, and digitalisation
|-
| 14:40 || The EERA vision for a Clean Energy Transition || Adel El Gammal || EERA
|-
| 15:00 || EERA DfE: Maximizing the impact of digitalisation as a cross-cutting activity within EERA || Rafael Mayo Garcia || CIEMAT
|-
| 15:20 || '''Break''' ||
|-
| 15.40 || SP1 (EoCoE): Toward exascale for a clean and decarbonized energy || Edouard Audit || CEA
|-
| 16:00 || SP2 (EERAdata): Machine-actionable data as a prerequisite for AI-applications || Valeria Jana Schwanitz || HVL
|-
| 16:20 || AI + FAIR for Energy || Tbd ||
|-
| 16:40 || Enabling dynamic and intelligent workflows in the future EuroHPC ecosystem || Rosa M Badia || BSC
|-
|}

== Agenda - 13 October: 09.00-12.15 ==

Continuation "Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data":
* Who are the communities in EERA working on data governance, AI applications, and HPC?
* What are current topics of interest?
* Insights from projects & presentations of use case examples

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| Perspectives on HPC and data: EERA tJP challenges
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Rafael Mayo Garcia
|-
| 09:00 || Towards an energy data space - the FEEDS project idea || Tbd || FEEDS consortium
|-
| 09:30 || Digitalization in nuclear materials research: facts and challenges || Marjorie Bertolus || CEA and SP Nuclear Matter
|-
| 09:45 || The role of digitalization at the development of sustainable hydropower || Eduard Doujak || TU Wien and SP Hydro
|-
| 10:00 || Seeking for new/improved materials for energy transition, impact of HPC and digitalization use || David Lacroix || Lorraine Univ and SP AMPEA
|-
| 10:15 || Digitalisation challenges for an effective Energy Systems Integration || Peter Breuhaus || Norce Research and SP ESI
|-
| 10:30 || ENTENTE – Defining and implementing a European Database for Multiscale Modelling || Marta Serrano Garcia || CIEMAT
|-
| 10.45 || The EERAdata platform - ideas for tools and services|| Astrid Unger || AIT and EERAdata
|-
| 11:00 || '''Break''' ||
|-
!colspan="6"| Perspectives on workflows and interoperable data: EERAdata Use Cases
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Valeria Jana Schwanitz
|-
| 11:15 || FAIRification challenges: Evidence from real life implementations || Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu || IUE, UC1 "Buildings Efficiency"
|-
| 11:30 || FAIRification put into practice - The code of the FAIR COMETS inventory on energy communities across Europe || August Wierling || HVL, UC2 "Energy Markets"
|-
| 11:45 || Experiences with establishing workflows for the material science database || Massimo Celino || ENEA, UC3 "Materials for energy"
|-
| 12:00 || Challenges in implementing FAIR principles in energy policy domain || Mariusz Kruczek || GIG, UC4 "Energy and energy efficiency policies"
|-
|}

== Agenda - 13 October: 13.30-17.30 ==
EERAdata hands-on!

The afternoon is organized in a slot with two breakout groups, followed by two plenaries.

'''13.30-15.00 Parallel breakout groups''' (BOG):

BOG organized by UC1 "Buildings efficiency". Format: Presentations, Q&A and discussion. Agenda with speakers and topics to follow.

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIR data challenges in Individual level data:
Cases and evidences from H2020 Projects
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderator: Prof. Dr. Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu, Izmir University of Economics, Turkey
|-
|
* Dr. Andrea Kollmann, Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Austria
* Dr. Johannes Reichl, Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Austria
|-
!colspan="6"| Discussant: Dr. Muhittin Hakan Demir, Izmir University of Economics, Turkey
|-
|}

Technical BOG "FAIRIfication in practice: Discussing solutions for technical challenges - integrating standards, supporting workflows". Organized by UC2 "Energy Markets" and UC3 "Material for energy". Format: Addressing in group discussion identified technical issues.

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIRIfication in practice:
Discussing solutions for technical challenges - integrating standards, supporting workflows
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderator: TbD
|-
|
* UC2 "Energy Markets"
* UC3 "Material for energy"
|-
!colspan="6"| Discussant: TbD
|-
|}

''Break of 30 min''

'''15.30-16.15 Collecting feedback from data users and stakeholders''' (to prepare a draft to survey user interests) organized by UC 4 "Energy and energy efficiency policies" (GIG team)
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIR data challenges in energy and energy efficiency policies
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderator: Mariusz Kruczek, GIG, Katowice
|-
|
Disscusion questions:
* What data related to energy policies are you looking for?
* Which strategy to search for data related to energy policies do you use?
* How do you use data extracted from energy policy databases?
* What are the expectations regarding the content of databases on energy policies?
* What would facilitate the use of data contained in energy policy databases?
|-
!colspan="6"|
|-
|}

''Break of 15 min''

'''16.30-17.30 Conclusions for the EERAdata platform: Which FAIR data services and tools to offer?''' organized by WP3 (AIT team)

== Agenda - 14 October: 09.00-12.30 ==
EERAdata hands-on!

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! !! Title !! Moderator
|-
| 09:00 || Discussion across use cases: How to advance the state of FAIR in the use cases? What are the plans for uploading use cases demos to the European Open Science Cloud? || Use case leaders
|-
| 11:30 || Plenary to wrap up discussions - how to continue working on the paper and how to prepare the 4th EERAdata workshop|| Valeria Jana Schwanitz
|-
|}

WS3

2021-09-28T13:15:41Z

Mariuszk: /* Agenda - 13 October: 13.30-17.30 */

'''Workshop N.3: "FAIRification put into practice - a joint workshop by EERAdata and the tJP Digitalization for Energy"'''

We are happy to announce that EERAdata jointly organizes the 3rd EERAdata workshop toghether with the [https://www.eera-set.eu/ EERA] tJP "[https://www.eera-set.eu/component/projects/projects.html?id=183 Digitalization for energy]" as part of their annual conference. The workshop is organized with online webinars and hands-on sessions between 12 and 14 October 2021. Data interoperability and workflows are recurrent themes of all workshop sessions.

== Objectives ==
* Present activities of the tJP Digitalization for Energy - From FAIR data governance to AI applications and Exascale computing
* Discuss and develop workflows for large-scale FAIR and open (simulation) data
* Synthesize community insights and formulate action points

== Read & watch aheads ==
In order to meet the WS3 objectives and to prepare for the paper writing hackathon, please have a look to:
* [[Preparatory workshop]] on the 6th July 2021, agenda and presentations
* Google doc working document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C7LKTGi_Cm2_oFZOIb5d8axdlrWIU7iw7RN5rqZ8RoQ/edit

== Agenda - 12 October: 14.00-16.00 ==
Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data:
* Who are the communities in EERA working on data governance, HPC, and AI applications?
* What are current topics of interest?
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Massimo Celino
|-
| 14:00 || Welcome and introduction || Giorgio Graditi || ENEA
|-
| 14:20 || The EU energy policy context || Vincent Berrutto || DG ENER, Unit Innovation, research, competitiveness, and digitalisation
|-
| 14:40 || The EERA vision for a Clean Energy Transition || Adel El Gammal || EERA
|-
| 15:00 || EERA DfE: Maximizing the impact of digitalisation as a cross-cutting activity within EERA || Rafael Mayo Garcia || CIEMAT
|-
| 15:20 || '''Break''' ||
|-
| 15.40 || SP1 (EoCoE): Toward exascale for a clean and decarbonized energy || Edouard Audit || CEA
|-
| 16:00 || SP2 (EERAdata): Machine-actionable data as a prerequisite for AI-applications || Valeria Jana Schwanitz || HVL
|-
| 16:20 || AI + FAIR for Energy || Tbd ||
|-
| 16:40 || Enabling dynamic and intelligent workflows in the future EuroHPC ecosystem || Rosa M Badia || BSC
|-
|}

== Agenda - 13 October: 09.00-12.15 ==

Continuation "Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data":
* Who are the communities in EERA working on data governance, AI applications, and HPC?
* What are current topics of interest?
* Insights from projects & presentations of use case examples

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| Perspectives on HPC and data: EERA tJP challenges
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Rafael Mayo Garcia
|-
| 09:00 || Towards an energy data space - the FEEDS project idea || Tbd || FEEDS consortium
|-
| 09:30 || Digitalization in nuclear materials research: facts and challenges || Marjorie Bertolus || CEA and SP Nuclear Matter
|-
| 09:45 || The role of digitalization at the development of sustainable hydropower || Eduard Doujak || TU Wien and SP Hydro
|-
| 10:00 || Seeking for new/improved materials for energy transition, impact of HPC and digitalization use || David Lacroix || Lorraine Univ and SP AMPEA
|-
| 10:15 || Digitalisation challenges for an effective Energy Systems Integration || Peter Breuhaus || Norce Research and SP ESI
|-
| 10:30 || ENTENTE – Defining and implementing a European Database for Multiscale Modelling || Marta Serrano Garcia || CIEMAT
|-
| 10.45 || The EERAdata platform - ideas for tools and services|| Astrid Unger || AIT and EERAdata
|-
| 11:00 || '''Break''' ||
|-
!colspan="6"| Perspectives on workflows and interoperable data: EERAdata Use Cases
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Valeria Jana Schwanitz
|-
| 11:15 || FAIRification challenges: Evidence from real life implementations || Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu || IUE, UC1 "Buildings Efficiency"
|-
| 11:30 || FAIRification put into practice - The code of the FAIR COMETS inventory on energy communities across Europe || August Wierling || HVL, UC2 "Energy Markets"
|-
| 11:45 || Experiences with establishing workflows for the material science database || Massimo Celino || ENEA, UC3 "Materials for energy"
|-
| 12:00 || Challenges in implementing FAIR principles in energy policy domain || Mariusz Kruczek || GIG, UC4 "Energy and energy efficiency policies"
|-
|}

== Agenda - 13 October: 13.30-17.30 ==
EERAdata hands-on!

The afternoon is organized in a slot with two breakout groups, followed by two plenaries.

'''13.30-15.00 Parallel breakout groups''' (BOG):

BOG organized by UC1 "Buildings efficiency". Format: Presentations, Q&A and discussion. Agenda with speakers and topics to follow.

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIR data challenges in Individual level data:
Cases and evidences from H2020 Projects
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderator: Prof. Dr. Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu, Izmir University of Economics, Turkey
|-
|
* Dr. Andrea Kollmann, Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Austria
* Dr. Johannes Reichl, Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Austria
|-
!colspan="6"| Discussant: Dr. Muhittin Hakan Demir, Izmir University of Economics, Turkey
|-
|}

Technical BOG "FAIRIfication in practice: Discussing solutions for technical challenges - integrating standards, supporting workflows". Organized by UC2 "Energy Markets" and UC3 "Material for energy". Format: Addressing in group discussion identified technical issues.

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIRIfication in practice:
Discussing solutions for technical challenges - integrating standards, supporting workflows
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderator: TbD
|-
|
* UC2 "Energy Markets"
* UC3 "Material for energy"
|-
!colspan="6"| Discussant: TbD
|-
|}

''Break of 30 min''

'''15.30-16.15 Collecting feedback from data users and stakeholders''' (to prepare a draft to survey user interests) organized by UC 4 "Energy and energy efficiency policies" (GIG team)
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIR data challenges in energy and energy efficiency policies
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderator: Mariusz Kruczek, GIG, Katowice
|-
|
*
|-
!colspan="6"|
|-
|}

''Break of 15 min''

'''16.30-17.30 Conclusions for the EERAdata platform: Which FAIR data services and tools to offer?''' organized by WP3 (AIT team)

== Agenda - 14 October: 09.00-12.30 ==
EERAdata hands-on!

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! !! Title !! Moderator
|-
| 09:00 || Discussion across use cases: How to advance the state of FAIR in the use cases? What are the plans for uploading use cases demos to the European Open Science Cloud? || Use case leaders
|-
| 11:30 || Plenary to wrap up discussions - how to continue working on the paper and how to prepare the 4th EERAdata workshop|| Valeria Jana Schwanitz
|-
|}

WS3

2021-09-28T11:13:53Z

Mariuszk:

'''Workshop N.3: "FAIRification put into practice - a joint workshop by EERAdata and the tJP Digitalization for Energy"'''

We are happy to announce that EERAdata jointly organizes the 3rd EERAdata workshop toghether with the [https://www.eera-set.eu/ EERA] tJP "[https://www.eera-set.eu/component/projects/projects.html?id=183 Digitalization for energy]" as part of their annual conference. The workshop is organized with online webinars and hands-on sessions between 12 and 14 October 2021. Data interoperability and workflows are recurrent themes of all workshop sessions.

== Objectives ==
* Present activities of the tJP Digitalization for Energy - From FAIR data governance to AI applications and Exascale computing
* Discuss and develop workflows for large-scale FAIR and open (simulation) data
* Synthesize community insights and formulate action points

== Read & watch aheads ==
In order to meet the WS3 objectives and to prepare for the paper writing hackathon, please have a look to:
* [[Preparatory workshop]] on the 6th July 2021, agenda and presentations
* Google doc working document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C7LKTGi_Cm2_oFZOIb5d8axdlrWIU7iw7RN5rqZ8RoQ/edit

== Agenda - 12 October: 14.00-16.00 ==
Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data:
* Who are the communities in EERA working on data governance, HPC, and AI applications?
* What are current topics of interest?
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Massimo Celino
|-
| 14:00 || Welcome and introduction || Giorgio Graditi || ENEA
|-
| 14:20 || The EU energy policy context || Vincent Berrutto || DG ENER, Unit Innovation, research, competitiveness, and digitalisation
|-
| 14:40 || The EERA vision for a Clean Energy Transition || Adel El Gammal || EERA
|-
| 15:00 || EERA DfE: Maximizing the impact of digitalisation as a cross-cutting activity within EERA || Rafael Mayo Garcia || CIEMAT
|-
| 15:20 || '''Break''' ||
|-
| 15.40 || SP1 (EoCoE): Toward exascale for a clean and decarbonized energy || Edouard Audit || CEA
|-
| 16:00 || SP2 (EERAdata): Machine-actionable data as a prerequisite for AI-applications || Valeria Jana Schwanitz || HVL
|-
| 16:20 || AI + FAIR for Energy || Tbd ||
|-
| 16:40 || Enabling dynamic and intelligent workflows in the future EuroHPC ecosystem || Rosa M Badia || BSC
|-
|}

== Agenda - 13 October: 09.00-12.15 ==

Continuation "Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data":
* Who are the communities in EERA working on data governance, AI applications, and HPC?
* What are current topics of interest?
* Insights from projects & presentations of use case examples

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| Perspectives on HPC and data: EERA tJP challenges
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Rafael Mayo Garcia
|-
| 09:00 || Towards an energy data space - the FEEDS project idea || Tbd || FEEDS consortium
|-
| 09:30 || Digitalization in nuclear materials research: facts and challenges || Marjorie Bertolus || CEA and SP Nuclear Matter
|-
| 09:45 || The role of digitalization at the development of sustainable hydropower || Eduard Doujak || TU Wien and SP Hydro
|-
| 10:00 || Seeking for new/improved materials for energy transition, impact of HPC and digitalization use || David Lacroix || Lorraine Univ and SP AMPEA
|-
| 10:15 || Digitalisation challenges for an effective Energy Systems Integration || Peter Breuhaus || Norce Research and SP ESI
|-
| 10:30 || ENTENTE – Defining and implementing a European Database for Multiscale Modelling || Marta Serrano Garcia || CIEMAT
|-
| 10.45 || The EERAdata platform - ideas for tools and services|| Astrid Unger || AIT and EERAdata
|-
| 11:00 || '''Break''' ||
|-
!colspan="6"| Perspectives on workflows and interoperable data: EERAdata Use Cases
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Valeria Jana Schwanitz
|-
| 11:15 || FAIRification challenges: Evidence from real life implementations || Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu || IUE, UC1 "Buildings Efficiency"
|-
| 11:30 || FAIRification put into practice - The code of the FAIR COMETS inventory on energy communities across Europe || August Wierling || HVL, UC2 "Energy Markets"
|-
| 11:45 || Experiences with establishing workflows for the material science database || Massimo Celino || ENEA, UC3 "Materials for energy"
|-
| 12:00 || Challenges in implementing FAIR principles in energy policy domain || Mariusz Kruczek || GIG, UC4 "Energy and energy efficiency policies"
|-
|}

== Agenda - 13 October: 13.30-17.30 ==
EERAdata hands-on!

The afternoon is organized in a slot with two breakout groups, followed by two plenaries.

'''13.30-15.00 Parallel breakout groups''' (BOG):

BOG organized by UC1 "Buildings efficiency". Format: Presentations, Q&A and discussion. Agenda with speakers and topics to follow.

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIR data challenges in Individual level data:
Cases and evidences from H2020 Projects
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderator: Prof. Dr. Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu, Izmir University of Economics, Turkey
|-
|
* Dr. Andrea Kollmann, Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Austria
* Dr. Johannes Reichl, Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Austria
|-
!colspan="6"| Discussant: Dr. Muhittin Hakan Demir, Izmir University of Economics, Turkey
|-
|}

Technical BOG "FAIRIfication in practice: Discussing solutions for technical challenges - integrating standards, supporting workflows". Organized by UC2 "Energy Markets" and UC3 "Material for energy". Format: Addressing in group discussion identified technical issues.

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIRIfication in practice:
Discussing solutions for technical challenges - integrating standards, supporting workflows
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderator: TbD
|-
|
* UC2 "Energy Markets"
* UC3 "Material for energy"
|-
!colspan="6"| Discussant: TbD
|-
|}

''Break of 30 min''

'''15.30-16.15 Collecting feedback from data users and stakeholders''' (to prepare a draft to survey user interests) organized by UC 4 "Energy and energy efficiency policies" (GIG team)

''Break of 15 min''

'''16.30-17.30 Conclusions for the EERAdata platform: Which FAIR data services and tools to offer?''' organized by WP3 (AIT team)

== Agenda - 14 October: 09.00-12.30 ==
EERAdata hands-on!

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! !! Title !! Moderator
|-
| 09:00 || Discussion across use cases: How to advance the state of FAIR in the use cases? What are the plans for uploading use cases demos to the European Open Science Cloud? || Use case leaders
|-
| 11:30 || Plenary to wrap up discussions - how to continue working on the paper and how to prepare the 4th EERAdata workshop|| Valeria Jana Schwanitz
|-
|}

WS3

2021-09-28T11:12:59Z

Mariuszk:

'''Workshop N.3: "FAIRification put into practice - a joint workshop by EERAdata and the tJP Digitalization for Energy"'''

We are happy to announce that EERAdata jointly organizes the 3rd EERAdata workshop toghether with the [https://www.eera-set.eu/ EERA] tJP "[https://www.eera-set.eu/component/projects/projects.html?id=183 Digitalization for energy]" as part of their annual conference. The workshop is organized with online webinars and hands-on sessions between 12 and 14 October 2021. Data interoperability and workflows are recurrent themes of all workshop sessions.

== Objectives ==
* Present activities of the tJP Digitalization for Energy - From FAIR data governance to AI applications and Exascale computing
* Discuss and develop workflows for large-scale FAIR and open (simulation) data
* Synthesize community insights and formulate action points

== Read & watch aheads ==
In order to meet the WS3 objectives and to prepare for the paper writing hackathon, please have a look to:
* [[Preparatory workshop]] on the 6th July 2021, agenda and presentations
* Google doc working document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1C7LKTGi_Cm2_oFZOIb5d8axdlrWIU7iw7RN5rqZ8RoQ/edit

== Agenda - 12 October: 14.00-16.00 ==
Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data:
* Who are the communities in EERA working on data governance, HPC, and AI applications?
* What are current topics of interest?
{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Massimo Celino
|-
| 14:00 || Welcome and introduction || Giorgio Graditi || ENEA
|-
| 14:20 || The EU energy policy context || Vincent Berrutto || DG ENER, Unit Innovation, research, competitiveness, and digitalisation
|-
| 14:40 || The EERA vision for a Clean Energy Transition || Adel El Gammal || EERA
|-
| 15:00 || EERA DfE: Maximizing the impact of digitalisation as a cross-cutting activity within EERA || Rafael Mayo Garcia || CIEMAT
|-
| 15:20 || '''Break''' ||
|-
| 15.40 || SP1 (EoCoE): Toward exascale for a clean and decarbonized energy || Edouard Audit || CEA
|-
| 16:00 || SP2 (EERAdata): Machine-actionable data as a prerequisite for AI-applications || Valeria Jana Schwanitz || HVL
|-
| 16:20 || AI + FAIR for Energy || Tbd ||
|-
| 16:40 || Enabling dynamic and intelligent workflows in the future EuroHPC ecosystem || Rosa M Badia || BSC
|-
|}

== Agenda - 13 October: 09.00-12.15 ==

Continuation "Towards High-Performance Computing (HPC) and the FAIRification of energy data":
* Who are the communities in EERA working on data governance, AI applications, and HPC?
* What are current topics of interest?
* Insights from projects & presentations of use case examples

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| Perspectives on HPC and data: EERA tJP challenges
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Rafael Mayo Garcia
|-
| 09:00 || Towards an energy data space - the FEEDS project idea || Tbd || FEEDS consortium
|-
| 09:30 || Digitalization in nuclear materials research: facts and challenges || Marjorie Bertolus || CEA and SP Nuclear Matter
|-
| 09:45 || The role of digitalization at the development of sustainable hydropower || Eduard Doujak || TU Wien and SP Hydro
|-
| 10:00 || Seeking for new/improved materials for energy transition, impact of HPC and digitalization use || David Lacroix || Lorraine Univ and SP AMPEA
|-
| 10:15 || Digitalisation challenges for an effective Energy Systems Integration || Peter Breuhaus || Norce Research and SP ESI
|-
| 10:30 || ENTENTE – Defining and implementing a European Database for Multiscale Modelling || Marta Serrano Garcia || CIEMAT
|-
| 10.45 || The EERAdata platform - ideas for tools and services|| Astrid Unger || AIT and EERAdata
|-
| 11:00 || '''Break''' ||
|-
!colspan="6"| Perspectives on workflows and interoperable data: EERAdata Use Cases
|-
!colspan="6"| Chair: Valeria Jana Schwanitz
|-
| 11:15 || FAIRification challenges: Evidence from real life implementations || Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu || IUE, UC1 "Buildings Efficiency"
|-
| 11:30 || FAIRification put into practice - The code of the FAIR COMETS inventory on energy communities across Europe || August Wierling || HVL, UC2 "Energy Markets"
|-
| 11:45 || Experiences with establishing workflows for the material science database || Massimo Celino || ENEA, UC3 "Materials for energy"
|-
| 12:00 || Challenges in implementing FAIR principles in energy policy domain || Team (GIG) || UC4 "Energy and energy efficiency policies"
|-
|}

== Agenda - 13 October: 13.30-17.30 ==
EERAdata hands-on!

The afternoon is organized in a slot with two breakout groups, followed by two plenaries.

'''13.30-15.00 Parallel breakout groups''' (BOG):

BOG organized by UC1 "Buildings efficiency". Format: Presentations, Q&A and discussion. Agenda with speakers and topics to follow.

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIR data challenges in Individual level data:
Cases and evidences from H2020 Projects
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderator: Prof. Dr. Mehmet Efe Biresselioglu, Izmir University of Economics, Turkey
|-
|
* Dr. Andrea Kollmann, Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Austria
* Dr. Johannes Reichl, Energieinstitut an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz, Austria
|-
!colspan="6"| Discussant: Dr. Muhittin Hakan Demir, Izmir University of Economics, Turkey
|-
|}

Technical BOG "FAIRIfication in practice: Discussing solutions for technical challenges - integrating standards, supporting workflows". Organized by UC2 "Energy Markets" and UC3 "Material for energy". Format: Addressing in group discussion identified technical issues.

{| class="wikitable"
|-
!colspan="6"| FAIRIfication in practice:
Discussing solutions for technical challenges - integrating standards, supporting workflows
|-
!colspan="6"| Moderator: TbD
|-
|
* UC2 "Energy Markets"
* UC3 "Material for energy"
|-
!colspan="6"| Discussant: TbD
|-
|}

''Break of 30 min''

'''15.30-16.15 Collecting feedback from data users and stakeholders''' (to prepare a draft to survey user interests) organized by UC 4 "Energy and energy efficiency policies" (GIG team)

''Break of 15 min''

'''16.30-17.30 Conclusions for the EERAdata platform: Which FAIR data services and tools to offer?''' organized by WP3 (AIT team)

== Agenda - 14 October: 09.00-12.30 ==
EERAdata hands-on!

{| class="wikitable"
|-
! !! Title !! Moderator
|-
| 09:00 || Discussion across use cases: How to advance the state of FAIR in the use cases? What are the plans for uploading use cases demos to the European Open Science Cloud? || Use case leaders
|-
| 11:30 || Plenary to wrap up discussions - how to continue working on the paper and how to prepare the 4th EERAdata workshop|| Valeria Jana Schwanitz
|-
|}

UC4

2020-06-03T18:55:14Z

Mariuszk: /* Metadata assessments */

== Low carbon energy and energy efficiency policies ==
=== General description of use case ===
The motivation for this use case is the significant role of policies, laws, and regulations in catalyzing the transformation of the energy system towards greenhouse gas and energy efficiency. They provide the ground for accelerating research and innovation, incentivizing behavioral changes, and safeguarding the necessary transformation processes. Through their texts and specifications, policies, laws, and regulations are not only defining the space for the application of energy technologies and low carbon energy materials, but they also provide the framework for market activities in general. An example is the enabling of new actors to appear on the energy market (e.g. prosumers, community energy, and energy cooperatives). Currently, a new role for data on low carbon energy and energy efficiency policies is emerging. The need to provide documentation on compliance with regulations is starkly increasing in complexity as integrated monitoring and assessment across fields and economic sectors are increasing. This not only refers to international compliance requirements (e.g. National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Intended Nationally Determined Contributions, Progress Reports for Sustainable Development Goals), but also to the level of companies whose produces have to adhere to given standards and documentation has to be provided for the entire supply chain (c.f. Ly et al. 2015 on a review of business process compliance approaches). Machine-actionability of relevant policy databases from local to global scale is therefore key for automated tracking, compilation, and inter-comparison with peers. Here, new business opportunities are arising. Overall, the state about the application of FAIR principles is still in its infancy. Openness is by nature less of an issue for this use case, but a specific challenge originates from mixed data formats, which include texts as well as number formats. Examples of databases from which EERAdata starts the use case activities include the IEA policy & measures databases, SETIS research, and innovation data, ResLegal, JRC in-house methodology for Monitoring R&I in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies, InnovationDB or activities, and tools developed in H2020 project ODYSSEE-MURE

== List of selected databases ==
During the first workshop (see notes from Day 2), the following databases were selected to analyze and improve their compliance with FAIR and Open data principles:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Name of database !! Short description !! Reasoning of choice !! Current state of FAIR/O principles !! Target of FAIR/O to achieve within EERAdata
|-
| COMETS [https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/837722]
|| The COMETS Inventory aims to track European Collective action (CAI) initiatives for the energy transition. It is being developed as part of the EU Horizon 2020 COMETS project. The Database currently contains around 3700 entries of CAIs with information on their Legal form, area of activity, address, membership numbers, financial aspects, etc. It further includes roughly 7000 entries on energy production units owned by the CAIs, with information of the date of installation, location, energy type, installed capacity, etc. One goal in building this inventory is to build a knowledge base for well-informed policy development on European and national levels.
|| We own the database and therefore have it easier to exercise FAIRification and opening activities. The Database if further still in development, allowing FAIRification already in the initial phases of the database development, compared to retrospectively FAIRifying already existing databases.
|| 0% FAIR, as still under development. Currently only accessible locally by the COMETS consortium. Current issues:
* Defining relevant initiatives: varying legal forms in each country
* Clear definition of area of activities
|| Provide all administrative and structural metadata. To a certain degree provide provenance information. Issue regarding provenance information will be the technical question of how to link the provenance information to the actual database entries. Descriptive metadata: develop ontology for metadata.

|-
| IEA Policy Database [https://www.iea.org/policies] || Database of policies and measures thematically related to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve energy efficiency and support the development and deployment of renewables and other clean energy technologies. It contains data from IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database, along with information on CCUS and methane abatement policies. Data are collected from governments, partner organizations and IEA analysis since 1999. || • A popular, recognized, and world-wide database hosted by a reputable institution. • Since we are not able to analyze all the databases that we would like to - the selection of the IEA Policy database would indirectly allow us to take into account several other, selected databases because it contains data from: IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database, • Cross-use case relevance, as it contains policies and measures also for buildings efficiency (UC1) and for power transmission and distribution networks (UC2). || F - easy;
A - easy;
I – quite ok (The database contains a description and metadata. Metadata are always available on IEA Policy database webside in English, but the document is linked to the page where it was published. So the language availability of a document depends on the publisher. Practically, many times the documents are available only in national language. Sometimes there is no link)
R - it seems to be ok || Example
|-
| EUR-Lex [https://eur-lex.europa.eu] || EUR-Lex is online database that provides the official and most comprehensive access to EU Law and legal documents such as treaties, legal acts from EU institutions, preparatory documents related to EU legislation, EU case-law, international agreements, EFTA documents, references to national case-law related to EU law. EUR-Lex has access to all editions of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ) since the first of December 1952|| • It is available in all of the EU’s 24 official languages • It is updated daily, which confirms the validity of the documents • Each document in EUR-Lex is supported by detailed information such as: relations with other legal documents, case-law interpretations, dates of adoption or entry into force etc. • It is the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to policy • Most documents in EUR-Lex, regardless of their language, receive a unique identifier - CELEX number, so all documents have a designed structure and each type of document corresponds to a so-called “a descriptor”. || Example || Example
|-
| JRC database hub [https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/] || The JRC Science Hub aims to gradually integrate and aggregate all of the European Commission's science related activities, tools, laboratories, facilities, databases and networks. The inventory is wide range of the compilation of databases development of software and modelling tools. Published on the basis of open data principles with clear descriptions for each entry. The tools and databases are categorised by name and acronym, but can be filtered by research area, keyword and JRC institute responsible for the coordination of the particular entry. It contains, inter alia, databases related to energy and transport and climate ||• It’s the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to different related aspects also energy policy related • It’s data interpretation is highly dependent on changes in the legal and policy frameworks across European Union. • Enhances the transparency and openness of the JRC and further enables the open access policy of scientific research data. • The information and links provided in the metadata are maintained in distributed and heterogeneous information systems. Although the datasets are maintain and links and information are updated,* Sources of the database are coming in a variety of European languages, all brought together in an English database. • Is cross-use case relevant, as it contains policies and measures also for other use cases. || F - easy; A - easy; I – some problems can be identified (The database contains a description and metadata. Metadata are not always actual and sometime in national language, it's collecting data hub); R - fulfill || Example
|}

== Metadata assessments ==
Databases above were assessed with respect to their current meta practices. The table below summarizes the current state and issues identified during WS 1:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Name of database !! Type of metadata provided !! Extend of metadata provided !! Level of implementation of FAIR/O principles !! Frameworks for metadata used !! Technical implementation of metadata
|-
| COMETS Inventory || Administrative - partly (source of information, Tracking of updates); Rights - to be defined soon || None, but intended to have: Deep descriptive metadata by ontology || None || none, but aiming for ontology || currently excel headers, but RDF intended
|-
| IEA Policy database [https://www.iea.org/policies] || administrative, descriptive, rights, structural || Administrative - intrinsic; Descriptive - extrinsic; Rights - intrinsic; Structural - intrinsic || F4 - yes; A1 - yes, A2 - yes (only depends on EU policy); I1 - yes; I2 - fulfilled, I3 - fulfilled; R1.1 - yes; R1.2 - no; R1.3 - not fulfilled, not even the DC standards. || thesaurus || LOD (linking open data) and plain text
|-
| EUR-Lex [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html] || Metadata including: a unique identifier; title and references; dates eg. date of last review and date of initial creation date; classification (structural); summarized and linked document(s); miscellaneous information like "Author", "Form", "Additional information" + procedure detailed information; authentic language and other ||These are fully sufficient metadata || Example || Example || Example
|-
| JRC database hub [https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/]|| Administrative, Descriptive, Structural, Rights || Extensive metadata in form of basic metadata and full metadata || Findable (F.1; F.2; F.3 – YES; F.4 – N/A); Accessible (A.1 – YES; A.2 – N/A); Interoperable (I.1; I.2; I.3 – YES); Reusable (R.1 – YES) || Thesaurus || xml, plain text, RDF, xml, csv, etc.
|}

UC4

2020-06-03T18:54:47Z

Mariuszk: /* Metadata assessments */

UC4

2020-06-03T18:54:22Z

Mariuszk: /* Metadata assessments */

UC4

2020-06-03T18:52:08Z

Mariuszk: /* Metadata assessments */

UC4

2020-06-03T18:42:04Z

Mariuszk: /* List of selected databases */

== Low carbon energy and energy efficiency policies ==
=== General description of use case ===
The motivation for this use case is the significant role of policies, laws, and regulations in catalyzing the transformation of the energy system towards greenhouse gas and energy efficiency. They provide the ground for accelerating research and innovation, incentivizing behavioral changes, and safeguarding the necessary transformation processes. Through their texts and specifications, policies, laws, and regulations are not only defining the space for the application of energy technologies and low carbon energy materials, but they also provide the framework for market activities in general. An example is the enabling of new actors to appear on the energy market (e.g. prosumers, community energy, and energy cooperatives). Currently, a new role for data on low carbon energy and energy efficiency policies is emerging. The need to provide documentation on compliance with regulations is starkly increasing in complexity as integrated monitoring and assessment across fields and economic sectors are increasing. This not only refers to international compliance requirements (e.g. National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Intended Nationally Determined Contributions, Progress Reports for Sustainable Development Goals), but also to the level of companies whose produces have to adhere to given standards and documentation has to be provided for the entire supply chain (c.f. Ly et al. 2015 on a review of business process compliance approaches). Machine-actionability of relevant policy databases from local to global scale is therefore key for automated tracking, compilation, and inter-comparison with peers. Here, new business opportunities are arising. Overall, the state about the application of FAIR principles is still in its infancy. Openness is by nature less of an issue for this use case, but a specific challenge originates from mixed data formats, which include texts as well as number formats. Examples of databases from which EERAdata starts the use case activities include the IEA policy & measures databases, SETIS research, and innovation data, ResLegal, JRC in-house methodology for Monitoring R&I in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies, InnovationDB or activities, and tools developed in H2020 project ODYSSEE-MURE

== List of selected databases ==
During the first workshop (see notes from Day 2), the following databases were selected to analyze and improve their compliance with FAIR and Open data principles:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Name of database !! Short description !! Reasoning of choice !! Current state of FAIR/O principles !! Target of FAIR/O to achieve within EERAdata
|-
| COMETS [https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/837722]
|| The COMETS Inventory aims to track European Collective action (CAI) initiatives for the energy transition. It is being developed as part of the EU Horizon 2020 COMETS project. The Database currently contains around 3700 entries of CAIs with information on their Legal form, area of activity, address, membership numbers, financial aspects, etc. It further includes roughly 7000 entries on energy production units owned by the CAIs, with information of the date of installation, location, energy type, installed capacity, etc. One goal in building this inventory is to build a knowledge base for well-informed policy development on European and national levels.
|| We own the database and therefore have it easier to exercise FAIRification and opening activities. The Database if further still in development, allowing FAIRification already in the initial phases of the database development, compared to retrospectively FAIRifying already existing databases.
|| 0% FAIR, as still under development. Currently only accessible locally by the COMETS consortium. Current issues:
* Defining relevant initiatives: varying legal forms in each country
* Clear definition of area of activities
|| Provide all administrative and structural metadata. To a certain degree provide provenance information. Issue regarding provenance information will be the technical question of how to link the provenance information to the actual database entries. Descriptive metadata: develop ontology for metadata.

|-
| IEA Policy Database [https://www.iea.org/policies] || Database of policies and measures thematically related to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve energy efficiency and support the development and deployment of renewables and other clean energy technologies. It contains data from IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database, along with information on CCUS and methane abatement policies. Data are collected from governments, partner organizations and IEA analysis since 1999. || • A popular, recognized, and world-wide database hosted by a reputable institution. • Since we are not able to analyze all the databases that we would like to - the selection of the IEA Policy database would indirectly allow us to take into account several other, selected databases because it contains data from: IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database, • Cross-use case relevance, as it contains policies and measures also for buildings efficiency (UC1) and for power transmission and distribution networks (UC2). || F - easy;
A - easy;
I – quite ok (The database contains a description and metadata. Metadata are always available on IEA Policy database webside in English, but the document is linked to the page where it was published. So the language availability of a document depends on the publisher. Practically, many times the documents are available only in national language. Sometimes there is no link)
R - it seems to be ok || Example
|-
| EUR-Lex [https://eur-lex.europa.eu] || EUR-Lex is online database that provides the official and most comprehensive access to EU Law and legal documents such as treaties, legal acts from EU institutions, preparatory documents related to EU legislation, EU case-law, international agreements, EFTA documents, references to national case-law related to EU law. EUR-Lex has access to all editions of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ) since the first of December 1952|| • It is available in all of the EU’s 24 official languages • It is updated daily, which confirms the validity of the documents • Each document in EUR-Lex is supported by detailed information such as: relations with other legal documents, case-law interpretations, dates of adoption or entry into force etc. • It is the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to policy • Most documents in EUR-Lex, regardless of their language, receive a unique identifier - CELEX number, so all documents have a designed structure and each type of document corresponds to a so-called “a descriptor”. || Example || Example
|-
| JRC database hub [https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/] || The JRC Science Hub aims to gradually integrate and aggregate all of the European Commission's science related activities, tools, laboratories, facilities, databases and networks. The inventory is wide range of the compilation of databases development of software and modelling tools. Published on the basis of open data principles with clear descriptions for each entry. The tools and databases are categorised by name and acronym, but can be filtered by research area, keyword and JRC institute responsible for the coordination of the particular entry. It contains, inter alia, databases related to energy and transport and climate ||• It’s the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to different related aspects also energy policy related • It’s data interpretation is highly dependent on changes in the legal and policy frameworks across European Union. • Enhances the transparency and openness of the JRC and further enables the open access policy of scientific research data. • The information and links provided in the metadata are maintained in distributed and heterogeneous information systems. Although the datasets are maintain and links and information are updated,* Sources of the database are coming in a variety of European languages, all brought together in an English database. • Is cross-use case relevant, as it contains policies and measures also for other use cases. || F - easy; A - easy; I – some problems can be identified (The database contains a description and metadata. Metadata are not always actual and sometime in national language, it's collecting data hub); R - fulfill || Example
|}

== Metadata assessments ==
Databases above were assessed with respect to their current meta practices. The table below summarizes the current state and issues identified during WS 1:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Name of database !! Type of metadata provided !! Extend of metadata provided !! Level of implementation of FAIR/O principles !! Frameworks for metadata used !! Technical implementation of metadata
|-
| COMETS Inventory || Administrative - partly (source of information, Tracking of updates); Rights - to be defined soon || None, but intended to have: Deep descriptive metadata by ontology || None || none, but aiming for ontology || currently excel headers, but RDF intended
|-
| IEA Policy database [https://www.iea.org/policies] || administrative, descriptive, rights, structural || Administrative - intrinsic; Descriptive - extrinsic; Rights - intrinsic; Structural - intrinsic || F4 - yes; A1 - yes, A2 - yes (only depends on EU policy); I1 - yes; I2 - fulfilled, I3 - fulfilled; R1.1 - yes; R1.2 - no; R1.3 - not fulfilled, not even the DC standards. || thesaurus || LOD (linking open data) and plain text
|-
| EUR-Lex [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html] || Metadata including: a unique identifier; title and references; dates eg. date of last review and date of initial creation date; classification (structural); summarized and linked document(s); miscellaneous information like "Author", "Form", "Additional information" + procedure detailed information; authentic language and other ||These are fully sufficient metadata || Example || Example || Example
|-
| JRC database hub [https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/]|| Administrative, Descriptive, Structural, Rights || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|}

UC4

2020-06-03T18:20:58Z

Mariuszk: /* Metadata assessments */

== Low carbon energy and energy efficiency policies ==
=== General description of use case ===
The motivation for this use case is the significant role of policies, laws, and regulations in catalyzing the transformation of the energy system towards greenhouse gas and energy efficiency. They provide the ground for accelerating research and innovation, incentivizing behavioral changes, and safeguarding the necessary transformation processes. Through their texts and specifications, policies, laws, and regulations are not only defining the space for the application of energy technologies and low carbon energy materials, but they also provide the framework for market activities in general. An example is the enabling of new actors to appear on the energy market (e.g. prosumers, community energy, and energy cooperatives). Currently, a new role for data on low carbon energy and energy efficiency policies is emerging. The need to provide documentation on compliance with regulations is starkly increasing in complexity as integrated monitoring and assessment across fields and economic sectors are increasing. This not only refers to international compliance requirements (e.g. National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Intended Nationally Determined Contributions, Progress Reports for Sustainable Development Goals), but also to the level of companies whose produces have to adhere to given standards and documentation has to be provided for the entire supply chain (c.f. Ly et al. 2015 on a review of business process compliance approaches). Machine-actionability of relevant policy databases from local to global scale is therefore key for automated tracking, compilation, and inter-comparison with peers. Here, new business opportunities are arising. Overall, the state about the application of FAIR principles is still in its infancy. Openness is by nature less of an issue for this use case, but a specific challenge originates from mixed data formats, which include texts as well as number formats. Examples of databases from which EERAdata starts the use case activities include the IEA policy & measures databases, SETIS research, and innovation data, ResLegal, JRC in-house methodology for Monitoring R&I in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies, InnovationDB or activities, and tools developed in H2020 project ODYSSEE-MURE

== List of selected databases ==
During the first workshop (see notes from Day 2), the following databases were selected to analyze and improve their compliance with FAIR and Open data principles:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Name of database !! Short description !! Reasoning of choice !! Current state of FAIR/O principles !! Target of FAIR/O to achieve within EERAdata
|-
| COMETS [https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/837722]
|| The COMETS Inventory aims to track European Collective action (CAI) initiatives for the energy transition. It is being developed as part of the EU Horizon 2020 COMETS project. The Database currently contains around 3700 entries of CAIs with information on their Legal form, area of activity, address, membership numbers, financial aspects, etc. It further includes roughly 7000 entries on energy production units owned by the CAIs, with information of the date of installation, location, energy type, installed capacity, etc. One goal in building this inventory is to build a knowledge base for well-informed policy development on European and national levels.
|| We own the database and therefore have it easier to exercise FAIRification and opening activities. The Database if further still in development, allowing FAIRification already in the initial phases of the database development, compared to retrospectively FAIRifying already existing databases.
|| 0% FAIR, as still under development. Currently only accessible locally by the COMETS consortium. Current issues:
* Defining relevant initiatives: varying legal forms in each country
* Clear definition of area of activities
|| Provide all administrative and structural metadata. To a certain degree provide provenance information. Issue regarding provenance information will be the technical question of how to link the provenance information to the actual database entries. Descriptive metadata: develop ontology for metadata.

|-
| IEA Policy Database [https://www.iea.org/policies] || Database of policies and measures thematically related to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve energy efficiency and support the development and deployment of renewables and other clean energy technologies. It contains data from IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database, along with information on CCUS and methane abatement policies. Data are collected from governments, partner organizations and IEA analysis since 1999. || • A popular, recognized, and world-wide database hosted by a reputable institution. • Since we are not able to analyze all the databases that we would like to - the selection of the IEA Policy database would indirectly allow us to take into account several other, selected databases because it contains data from: IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database, • Cross-use case relevance, as it contains policies and measures also for buildings efficiency (UC1) and for power transmission and distribution networks (UC2). || F - easy;
A - easy;
I – quite ok (The database contains a description and metadata. Metadata are always available on IEA Policy database webside in English, but the document is linked to the page where it was published. So the language availability of a document depends on the publisher. Practically, many times the documents are available only in national language. Sometimes there is no link)
R - it seems to be ok || Example
|-
| EUR-Lex [https://eur-lex.europa.eu] || EUR-Lex is online database that provides the official and most comprehensive access to EU Law and legal documents such as treaties, legal acts from EU institutions, preparatory documents related to EU legislation, EU case-law, international agreements, EFTA documents, references to national case-law related to EU law. EUR-Lex has access to all editions of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ) since the first of December 1952|| • It is available in all of the EU’s 24 official languages • It is updated daily, which confirms the validity of the documents • Each document in EUR-Lex is supported by detailed information such as: relations with other legal documents, case-law interpretations, dates of adoption or entry into force etc. • It is the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to policy • Most documents in EUR-Lex, regardless of their language, receive a unique identifier - CELEX number, so all documents have a designed structure and each type of document corresponds to a so-called “a descriptor”. || Example || Example
|-
| JRC database hub [https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/] || The JRC Science Hub aims to gradually integrate and aggregate all of the European Commission's science related activities, tools, laboratories, facilities, databases and networks. The inventory is wide range of the compilation of databases development of software and modelling tools. Published on the basis of open data principles with clear descriptions for each entry. The tools and databases are categorised by name and acronym, but can be filtered by research area, keyword and JRC institute responsible for the coordination of the particular entry. It contains, inter alia, databases related to energy and transport and climate ||• It’s the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to different related aspects also energy policy related • It’s data interpretation is highly dependent on changes in the legal and policy frameworks across European Union. • Enhances the transparency and openness of the JRC and further enables the open access policy of scientific research data. • The information and links provided in the metadata are maintained in distributed and heterogeneous information systems. Although the datasets are maintain and links and information are updated,* Sources of the database are coming in a variety of European languages, all brought together in an English database. • Is cross-use case relevant, as it contains policies and measures also for other use cases. || F - easy; A - easy; I – some problems can be identified (The database contains a description and metadata. Metadata are not always actual and sometime in national language; R - fulfill || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|}

== Metadata assessments ==
Databases above were assessed with respect to their current meta practices. The table below summarizes the current state and issues identified during WS 1:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Name of database !! Type of metadata provided !! Extend of metadata provided !! Level of implementation of FAIR/O principles !! Frameworks for metadata used !! Technical implementation of metadata
|-
| COMETS Inventory || Administrative - partly (source of information, Tracking of updates); Rights - to be defined soon || None, but intended to have: Deep descriptive metadata by ontology || None || none, but aiming for ontology || currently excel headers, but RDF intended
|-
| IEA Policy database [https://www.iea.org/policies] || administrative, descriptive, rights, structural || Administrative - intrinsic; Descriptive - extrinsic; Rights - intrinsic; Structural - intrinsic || F4 - yes; A1 - yes, A2 - yes (only depends on EU policy); I1 - yes; I2 - fulfilled, I3 - fulfilled; R1.1 - yes; R1.2 - no; R1.3 - not fulfilled, not even the DC standards. || thesaurus || LOD (linking open data) and plain text
|-
| EUR-Lex [https://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html] || Metadata including: a unique identifier; title and references; dates eg. date of last review and date of initial creation date; classification (structural); summarized and linked document(s); miscellaneous information like "Author", "Form", "Additional information" + procedure detailed information; authentic language and other ||These are fully sufficient metadata || Example || Example || Example
|-
| JRC database hub [https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/]|| Administrative, Descriptive, Structural, Rights || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|}

UC4

2020-06-03T13:34:14Z

Mariuszk: /* List of selected databases */

== Low carbon energy and energy efficiency policies ==
=== General description of use case ===
The motivation for this use case is the significant role of policies, laws, and regulations in catalyzing the transformation of the energy system towards greenhouse gas and energy efficiency. They provide the ground for accelerating research and innovation, incentivizing behavioral changes, and safeguarding the necessary transformation processes. Through their texts and specifications, policies, laws, and regulations are not only defining the space for the application of energy technologies and low carbon energy materials, but they also provide the framework for market activities in general. An example is the enabling of new actors to appear on the energy market (e.g. prosumers, community energy, and energy cooperatives). Currently, a new role for data on low carbon energy and energy efficiency policies is emerging. The need to provide documentation on compliance with regulations is starkly increasing in complexity as integrated monitoring and assessment across fields and economic sectors are increasing. This not only refers to international compliance requirements (e.g. National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Intended Nationally Determined Contributions, Progress Reports for Sustainable Development Goals), but also to the level of companies whose produces have to adhere to given standards and documentation has to be provided for the entire supply chain (c.f. Ly et al. 2015 on a review of business process compliance approaches). Machine-actionability of relevant policy databases from local to global scale is therefore key for automated tracking, compilation, and inter-comparison with peers. Here, new business opportunities are arising. Overall, the state about the application of FAIR principles is still in its infancy. Openness is by nature less of an issue for this use case, but a specific challenge originates from mixed data formats, which include texts as well as number formats. Examples of databases from which EERAdata starts the use case activities include the IEA policy & measures databases, SETIS research, and innovation data, ResLegal, JRC in-house methodology for Monitoring R&I in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies, InnovationDB or activities, and tools developed in H2020 project ODYSSEE-MURE

== List of selected databases ==
During the first workshop (see notes from Day 2), the following databases were selected to analyze and improve their compliance with FAIR and Open data principles:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Name of database !! Short description !! Reasoning of choice !! Current state of FAIR/O principles !! Target of FAIR/O to achieve within EERAdata
|-
| COMETS [https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/837722]
|| Write a short description, e.g., "Database 1 is about XXX, containing XXX data, covering the period xxx."
|| Summarize shortly the main reasons, why this DB was chosen. Link to the discussion page of [[WS1UC4]].
|| What is the current FAIR/O state for this database. Summarize here. In case more space is needed, link to a section of the discussion page of [[WS1UC4]].
|| What FAIR/O target was decided?

|-
| IEA Policy Database [https://www.iea.org/policies] || Database of policies and measures thematically related to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve energy efficiency and support the development and deployment of renewables and other clean energy technologies. It contains data from IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database, along with information on CCUS and methane abatement policies. Data are collected from governments, partner organizations and IEA analysis since 1999. || • A popular, recognized, and world-wide database hosted by a reputable institution. • Since we are not able to analyze all the databases that we would like to - the selection of the IEA Policy database would indirectly allow us to take into account several other, selected databases because it contains data from: IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database, • Cross-use case relevance, as it contains policies and measures also for buildings efficiency (UC1) and for power transmission and distribution networks (UC2). || F - easy;
A - easy;
I – quite ok (The database contains a description and metadata. Metadata are always available on IEA Policy database webside in English, but the document is linked to the page where it was published. So the language availability of a document depends on the publisher. Practically, many times the documents are available only in national language. Sometimes there is no link)
R - it seems to be ok || Example
|-
| EUR-Lex [https://eur-lex.europa.eu] || EUR-Lex is online database that provides the official and most comprehensive access to EU Law and legal documents such as treaties, legal acts from EU institutions, preparatory documents related to EU legislation, EU case-law, international agreements, EFTA documents, references to national case-law related to EU law. EUR-Lex has access to all editions of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ) since the first of December 1952|| • It is available in all of the EU’s 24 official languages • It is updated daily, which confirms the validity of the documents • Each document in EUR-Lex is supported by detailed information such as: relations with other legal documents, case-law interpretations, dates of adoption or entry into force etc. • It is the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to policy • Most documents in EUR-Lex, regardless of their language, receive a unique identifier - CELEX number, so all documents have a designed structure and each type of document corresponds to a so-called “a descriptor”. || Example || Example
|-
| JRC database hub [https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/] || The JRC Science Hub aims to gradually integrate and aggregate all of the European Commission's science related activities, tools, laboratories, facilities, databases and networks. The inventory is wide range of the compilation of databases development of software and modelling tools. Published on the basis of open data principles with clear descriptions for each entry. The tools and databases are categorised by name and acronym, but can be filtered by research area, keyword and JRC institute responsible for the coordination of the particular entry. It contains, inter alia, databases related to energy and transport and climate ||• It’s the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to different related aspects also energy policy related • It’s data interpretation is highly dependent on changes in the legal and policy frameworks across European Union. • Enhances the transparency and openness of the JRC and further enables the open access policy of scientific research data. • The information and links provided in the metadata are maintained in distributed and heterogeneous information systems. Although the datasets are maintain and links and information are updated,* Sources of the database are coming in a variety of European languages, all brought together in an English database. • Is cross-use case relevant, as it contains policies and measures also for other use cases. || F - easy; A - easy; I – some problems can be identified (The database contains a description and metadata. Metadata are not always actual and sometime in national language; R - fulfill || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|}

== Metadata assessments ==
Databases above were assessed with respect to their current meta practices. The table below summarizes the current state and issues identified during WS 1:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Name of database !! Type of metadata provided !! Extend of metadata provided !! Level of implementation of FAIR/O principles !! Frameworks for metadata used !! Technical implementation of metadata
|-
| COMETS [Link to database 1|Database 1]] || Which types of metadata are covered? Administrative, descriptive, structural, provenance of data, etc.? || Summarize: Is it rich or basic metadata provided for each of the types? || Check the Wilkinson criteria for metadata and summarize here. In case more space is needed, link to a section of [[WS1UC4]]. || What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology? || How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.
|-
| IEA Policy database || administrative, descriptive, rights, structural || Administrative - intrinsic; Descriptive - extrinsic; Rights - intrinsic; Structural - intrinsic || F4 - yes; A1 - yes, A2 - yes (only depends on EU policy); I1 - yes; I2 - fulfilled, I3 - fulfilled; R1.1 - yes; R1.2 - no; R1.3 - not fulfilled, not even the DC standards. || thesaurus || LOD (linking open data) and plain text
|-
| COMETS Inventory || Administrative - partly (source of information, Tracking of updates); Rights - to be defined soon || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|}

UC4

2020-06-03T13:33:47Z

Mariuszk: /* List of selected databases */

== Low carbon energy and energy efficiency policies ==
=== General description of use case ===
The motivation for this use case is the significant role of policies, laws, and regulations in catalyzing the transformation of the energy system towards greenhouse gas and energy efficiency. They provide the ground for accelerating research and innovation, incentivizing behavioral changes, and safeguarding the necessary transformation processes. Through their texts and specifications, policies, laws, and regulations are not only defining the space for the application of energy technologies and low carbon energy materials, but they also provide the framework for market activities in general. An example is the enabling of new actors to appear on the energy market (e.g. prosumers, community energy, and energy cooperatives). Currently, a new role for data on low carbon energy and energy efficiency policies is emerging. The need to provide documentation on compliance with regulations is starkly increasing in complexity as integrated monitoring and assessment across fields and economic sectors are increasing. This not only refers to international compliance requirements (e.g. National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Intended Nationally Determined Contributions, Progress Reports for Sustainable Development Goals), but also to the level of companies whose produces have to adhere to given standards and documentation has to be provided for the entire supply chain (c.f. Ly et al. 2015 on a review of business process compliance approaches). Machine-actionability of relevant policy databases from local to global scale is therefore key for automated tracking, compilation, and inter-comparison with peers. Here, new business opportunities are arising. Overall, the state about the application of FAIR principles is still in its infancy. Openness is by nature less of an issue for this use case, but a specific challenge originates from mixed data formats, which include texts as well as number formats. Examples of databases from which EERAdata starts the use case activities include the IEA policy & measures databases, SETIS research, and innovation data, ResLegal, JRC in-house methodology for Monitoring R&I in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies, InnovationDB or activities, and tools developed in H2020 project ODYSSEE-MURE

== List of selected databases ==
During the first workshop (see notes from Day 2), the following databases were selected to analyze and improve their compliance with FAIR and Open data principles:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Name of database !! Short description !! Reasoning of choice !! Current state of FAIR/O principles !! Target of FAIR/O to achieve within EERAdata
|-
| COMETS [https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/837722]
|| Write a short description, e.g., "Database 1 is about XXX, containing XXX data, covering the period xxx."
|| Summarize shortly the main reasons, why this DB was chosen. Link to the discussion page of [[WS1UC4]].
|| What is the current FAIR/O state for this database. Summarize here. In case more space is needed, link to a section of the discussion page of [[WS1UC4]].
|| What FAIR/O target was decided?

|-
| IEA Policy Database [https://www.iea.org/policies] || Database of policies and measures thematically related to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve energy efficiency and support the development and deployment of renewables and other clean energy technologies. It contains data from IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database, along with information on CCUS and methane abatement policies. Data are collected from governments, partner organizations and IEA analysis since 1999. || • A popular, recognized, and world-wide database hosted by a reputable institution. • Since we are not able to analyze all the databases that we would like to - the selection of the IEA Policy database would indirectly allow us to take into account several other, selected databases because it contains data from: IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database, • Cross-use case relevance, as it contains policies and measures also for buildings efficiency (UC1) and for power transmission and distribution networks (UC2). || F - easy;
A - easy;
I – quite ok (The database contains a description and metadata. Metadata are always available on IEA Policy database webside in English, but the document is linked to the page where it was published. So the language availability of a document depends on the publisher. Practically, many times the documents are available only in national language. Sometimes there is no link)
R - it seems to be ok || Example
|-
| EUR-Lex [https://eur-lex.europa.eu] || EUR-Lex is online database that provides the official and most comprehensive access to EU Law and legal documents such as treaties, legal acts from EU institutions, preparatory documents related to EU legislation, EU case-law, international agreements, EFTA documents, references to national case-law related to EU law. EUR-Lex has access to all editions of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ) since the first of December 1952|| • It is available in all of the EU’s 24 official languages • It is updated daily, which confirms the validity of the documents • Each document in EUR-Lex is supported by detailed information such as: relations with other legal documents, case-law interpretations, dates of adoption or entry into force etc. • It is the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to policy • Most documents in EUR-Lex, regardless of their language, receive a unique identifier - CELEX number, so all documents have a designed structure and each type of document corresponds to a so-called “a descriptor”. || Example || Example
|-
| JRC database hub [https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/] || The JRC Science Hub aims to gradually integrate and aggregate all of the European Commission's science related activities, tools, laboratories, facilities, databases and networks. The inventory is wide range of the compilation of databases development of software and modelling tools. Published on the basis of open data principles with clear descriptions for each entry. The tools and databases are categorised by name and acronym, but can be filtered by research area, keyword and JRC institute responsible for the coordination of the particular entry. It contains, inter alia, databases related to energy and transport and climate ||• It’s the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to different related aspects also energy policy related • It’s data interpretation is highly dependent on changes in the legal and policy frameworks across European Union. • Enhances the transparency and openness of the JRC and further enables the open access policy of scientific research data. • The information and links provided in the metadata are maintained in distributed and heterogeneous information systems. Although the datasets are maintain and links and information are updated,* Sources of the database are coming in a variety of European languages, all brought together in an English database. • Is cross-use case relevant, as it contains policies and measures also for other use cases. || F - easy; A - easy; I – some problems can be identified (The database contains a description and metadata. Metadata are not always actual and sometime in national language; R - fulfill || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|}

== Metadata assessments ==
Databases above were assessed with respect to their current meta practices. The table below summarizes the current state and issues identified during WS 1:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Name of database !! Type of metadata provided !! Extend of metadata provided !! Level of implementation of FAIR/O principles !! Frameworks for metadata used !! Technical implementation of metadata
|-
| COMETS [Link to database 1|Database 1]] || Which types of metadata are covered? Administrative, descriptive, structural, provenance of data, etc.? || Summarize: Is it rich or basic metadata provided for each of the types? || Check the Wilkinson criteria for metadata and summarize here. In case more space is needed, link to a section of [[WS1UC4]]. || What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology? || How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.
|-
| IEA Policy database || administrative, descriptive, rights, structural || Administrative - intrinsic; Descriptive - extrinsic; Rights - intrinsic; Structural - intrinsic || F4 - yes; A1 - yes, A2 - yes (only depends on EU policy); I1 - yes; I2 - fulfilled, I3 - fulfilled; R1.1 - yes; R1.2 - no; R1.3 - not fulfilled, not even the DC standards. || thesaurus || LOD (linking open data) and plain text
|-
| COMETS Inventory || Administrative - partly (source of information, Tracking of updates); Rights - to be defined soon || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|}

UC4

2020-06-03T10:48:32Z

Mariuszk: /* List of selected databases */

== Low carbon energy and energy efficiency policies ==
=== General description of use case ===
The motivation for this use case is the significant role of policies, laws, and regulations in catalyzing the transformation of the energy system towards greenhouse gas and energy efficiency. They provide the ground for accelerating research and innovation, incentivizing behavioral changes, and safeguarding the necessary transformation processes. Through their texts and specifications, policies, laws, and regulations are not only defining the space for the application of energy technologies and low carbon energy materials, but they also provide the framework for market activities in general. An example is the enabling of new actors to appear on the energy market (e.g. prosumers, community energy, and energy cooperatives). Currently, a new role for data on low carbon energy and energy efficiency policies is emerging. The need to provide documentation on compliance with regulations is starkly increasing in complexity as integrated monitoring and assessment across fields and economic sectors are increasing. This not only refers to international compliance requirements (e.g. National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Intended Nationally Determined Contributions, Progress Reports for Sustainable Development Goals), but also to the level of companies whose produces have to adhere to given standards and documentation has to be provided for the entire supply chain (c.f. Ly et al. 2015 on a review of business process compliance approaches). Machine-actionability of relevant policy databases from local to global scale is therefore key for automated tracking, compilation, and inter-comparison with peers. Here, new business opportunities are arising. Overall, the state about the application of FAIR principles is still in its infancy. Openness is by nature less of an issue for this use case, but a specific challenge originates from mixed data formats, which include texts as well as number formats. Examples of databases from which EERAdata starts the use case activities include the IEA policy & measures databases, SETIS research, and innovation data, ResLegal, JRC in-house methodology for Monitoring R&I in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies, InnovationDB or activities, and tools developed in H2020 project ODYSSEE-MURE

== List of selected databases ==
During the first workshop (see notes from Day 2), the following databases were selected to analyze and improve their compliance with FAIR and Open data principles:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Name of database !! Short description !! Reasoning of choice !! Current state of FAIR/O principles !! Target of FAIR/O to achieve within EERAdata
|-
| COMETS [https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/837722]
|| Write a short description, e.g., "Database 1 is about XXX, containing XXX data, covering the period xxx."
|| Summarize shortly the main reasons, why this DB was chosen. Link to the discussion page of [[WS1UC4]].
|| What is the current FAIR/O state for this database. Summarize here. In case more space is needed, link to a section of the discussion page of [[WS1UC4]].
|| What FAIR/O target was decided?

|-
| IEA Policy Database [https://www.iea.org/policies] || Database of policies and measures thematically related to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve energy efficiency and support the development and deployment of renewables and other clean energy technologies. It contains data from IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database, along with information on CCUS and methane abatement policies. Data are collected from governments, partner organizations and IEA analysis since 1999. || • A popular, recognized, and world-wide database hosted by a reputable institution. • Since we are not able to analyze all the databases that we would like to - the selection of the IEA Policy database would indirectly allow us to take into account several other, selected databases because it contains data from: IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database, • Cross-use case relevance, as it contains policies and measures also for buildings efficiency (UC1) and for power transmission and distribution networks (UC2). || Example || Example
|-
| EUR-Lex [https://eur-lex.europa.eu] || EUR-Lex is online database that provides the official and most comprehensive access to EU Law and legal documents such as treaties, legal acts from EU institutions, preparatory documents related to EU legislation, EU case-law, international agreements, EFTA documents, references to national case-law related to EU law. EUR-Lex has access to all editions of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ) since the first of December 1952|| • It is available in all of the EU’s 24 official languages • It is updated daily, which confirms the validity of the documents • Each document in EUR-Lex is supported by detailed information such as: relations with other legal documents, case-law interpretations, dates of adoption or entry into force etc. • It is the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to policy • Most documents in EUR-Lex, regardless of their language, receive a unique identifier - CELEX number, so all documents have a designed structure and each type of document corresponds to a so-called “a descriptor”. || Example || Example
|-
| JRC database hub [https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/] || The JRC Science Hub aims to gradually integrate and aggregate all of the European Commission's science related activities, tools, laboratories, facilities, databases and networks. The inventory is wide range of the compilation of databases development of software and modelling tools. Published on the basis of open data principles with clear descriptions for each entry. The tools and databases are categorised by name and acronym, but can be filtered by research area, keyword and JRC institute responsible for the coordination of the particular entry. It contains, inter alia, databases related to energy and transport and climate ||• It’s the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to different related aspects also energy policy related • It’s data interpretation is highly dependent on changes in the legal and policy frameworks across European Union. • Enhances the transparency and openness of the JRC and further enables the open access policy of scientific research data. • The information and links provided in the metadata are maintained in distributed and heterogeneous information systems. Although the datasets are maintain and links and information are updated,* Sources of the database are coming in a variety of European languages, all brought together in an English database. • Is cross-use case relevant, as it contains policies and measures also for other use cases. Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|}

== Metadata assessments ==
Databases above were assessed with respect to their current meta practices. The table below summarizes the current state and issues identified during WS 1:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Name of database !! Type of metadata provided !! Extend of metadata provided !! Level of implementation of FAIR/O principles !! Frameworks for metadata used !! Technical implementation of metadata
|-
| [[Link to database 1|Database 1]] || Which types of metadata are covered? Administrative, descriptive, structural, provenance of data, etc.? || Summarize: Is it rich or basic metadata provided for each of the types? || Check the Wilkinson criteria for metadata and summarize here. In case more space is needed, link to a section of [[WS1UC4]]. || What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology? || How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|}

UC4

2020-06-03T10:47:12Z

Mariuszk: /* List of selected databases */

== Low carbon energy and energy efficiency policies ==
=== General description of use case ===
The motivation for this use case is the significant role of policies, laws, and regulations in catalyzing the transformation of the energy system towards greenhouse gas and energy efficiency. They provide the ground for accelerating research and innovation, incentivizing behavioral changes, and safeguarding the necessary transformation processes. Through their texts and specifications, policies, laws, and regulations are not only defining the space for the application of energy technologies and low carbon energy materials, but they also provide the framework for market activities in general. An example is the enabling of new actors to appear on the energy market (e.g. prosumers, community energy, and energy cooperatives). Currently, a new role for data on low carbon energy and energy efficiency policies is emerging. The need to provide documentation on compliance with regulations is starkly increasing in complexity as integrated monitoring and assessment across fields and economic sectors are increasing. This not only refers to international compliance requirements (e.g. National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Intended Nationally Determined Contributions, Progress Reports for Sustainable Development Goals), but also to the level of companies whose produces have to adhere to given standards and documentation has to be provided for the entire supply chain (c.f. Ly et al. 2015 on a review of business process compliance approaches). Machine-actionability of relevant policy databases from local to global scale is therefore key for automated tracking, compilation, and inter-comparison with peers. Here, new business opportunities are arising. Overall, the state about the application of FAIR principles is still in its infancy. Openness is by nature less of an issue for this use case, but a specific challenge originates from mixed data formats, which include texts as well as number formats. Examples of databases from which EERAdata starts the use case activities include the IEA policy & measures databases, SETIS research, and innovation data, ResLegal, JRC in-house methodology for Monitoring R&I in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies, InnovationDB or activities, and tools developed in H2020 project ODYSSEE-MURE

== List of selected databases ==
During the first workshop (see notes from Day 2), the following databases were selected to analyze and improve their compliance with FAIR and Open data principles:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Name of database !! Short description !! Reasoning of choice !! Current state of FAIR/O principles !! Target of FAIR/O to achieve within EERAdata
|-
| COMETS [https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/837722]
|| Write a short description, e.g., "Database 1 is about XXX, containing XXX data, covering the period xxx."
|| Summarize shortly the main reasons, why this DB was chosen. Link to the discussion page of [[WS1UC4]].
|| What is the current FAIR/O state for this database. Summarize here. In case more space is needed, link to a section of the discussion page of [[WS1UC4]].
|| What FAIR/O target was decided?

|-
| IEA Policy Database [https://www.iea.org/policies] || Database of policies and measures thematically related to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve energy efficiency and support the development and deployment of renewables and other clean energy technologies. It contains data from IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database, along with information on CCUS and methane abatement policies. Data are collected from governments, partner organizations and IEA analysis since 1999. || • A popular, recognized, and world-wide database hosted by a reputable institution. • Since we are not able to analyze all the databases that we would like to - the selection of the IEA Policy database would indirectly allow us to take into account several other, selected databases because it contains data from: IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database, • Cross-use case relevance, as it contains policies and measures also for buildings efficiency (UC1) and for power transmission and distribution networks (UC2). || Example || Example
|-
| EUR-Lex [https://eur-lex.europa.eu] || EUR-Lex is online database that provides the official and most comprehensive access to EU Law and legal documents such as treaties, legal acts from EU institutions, preparatory documents related to EU legislation, EU case-law, international agreements, EFTA documents, references to national case-law related to EU law. EUR-Lex has access to all editions of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ) since the first of December 1952|| • It is available in all of the EU’s 24 official languages
• It is updated daily, which confirms the validity of the documents • Each document in EUR-Lex is supported by detailed information such as: relations with other legal documents, case-law interpretations, dates of adoption or entry into force etc. • It is the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to policy • Most documents in EUR-Lex, regardless of their language, receive a unique identifier - CELEX number, so all documents have a designed structure and each type of document corresponds to a so-called “a descriptor”. || Example || Example
|-
| JRC database hub [https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/] || The JRC Science Hub aims to gradually integrate and aggregate all of the European Commission's science related activities, tools, laboratories, facilities, databases and networks. The inventory is wide range of the compilation of databases development of software and modelling tools. Published on the basis of open data principles with clear descriptions for each entry. The tools and databases are categorised by name and acronym, but can be filtered by research area, keyword and JRC institute responsible for the coordination of the particular entry. It contains, inter alia, databases related to energy and transport and climate ||• It’s the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to different related aspects also energy policy related • It’s data interpretation is highly dependent on changes in the legal and policy frameworks across European Union. • Enhances the transparency and openness of the JRC and further enables the open access policy of scientific research data. • The information and links provided in the metadata are maintained in distributed and heterogeneous information systems. Although the datasets are maintain and links and information are updated,* Sources of the database are coming in a variety of European languages, all brought together in an English database. • Is cross-use case relevant, as it contains policies and measures also for other use cases. Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|}

== Metadata assessments ==
Databases above were assessed with respect to their current meta practices. The table below summarizes the current state and issues identified during WS 1:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Name of database !! Type of metadata provided !! Extend of metadata provided !! Level of implementation of FAIR/O principles !! Frameworks for metadata used !! Technical implementation of metadata
|-
| [[Link to database 1|Database 1]] || Which types of metadata are covered? Administrative, descriptive, structural, provenance of data, etc.? || Summarize: Is it rich or basic metadata provided for each of the types? || Check the Wilkinson criteria for metadata and summarize here. In case more space is needed, link to a section of [[WS1UC4]]. || What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology? || How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|}

UC4

2020-06-03T10:46:53Z

Mariuszk: /* List of selected databases */

== Low carbon energy and energy efficiency policies ==
=== General description of use case ===
The motivation for this use case is the significant role of policies, laws, and regulations in catalyzing the transformation of the energy system towards greenhouse gas and energy efficiency. They provide the ground for accelerating research and innovation, incentivizing behavioral changes, and safeguarding the necessary transformation processes. Through their texts and specifications, policies, laws, and regulations are not only defining the space for the application of energy technologies and low carbon energy materials, but they also provide the framework for market activities in general. An example is the enabling of new actors to appear on the energy market (e.g. prosumers, community energy, and energy cooperatives). Currently, a new role for data on low carbon energy and energy efficiency policies is emerging. The need to provide documentation on compliance with regulations is starkly increasing in complexity as integrated monitoring and assessment across fields and economic sectors are increasing. This not only refers to international compliance requirements (e.g. National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Intended Nationally Determined Contributions, Progress Reports for Sustainable Development Goals), but also to the level of companies whose produces have to adhere to given standards and documentation has to be provided for the entire supply chain (c.f. Ly et al. 2015 on a review of business process compliance approaches). Machine-actionability of relevant policy databases from local to global scale is therefore key for automated tracking, compilation, and inter-comparison with peers. Here, new business opportunities are arising. Overall, the state about the application of FAIR principles is still in its infancy. Openness is by nature less of an issue for this use case, but a specific challenge originates from mixed data formats, which include texts as well as number formats. Examples of databases from which EERAdata starts the use case activities include the IEA policy & measures databases, SETIS research, and innovation data, ResLegal, JRC in-house methodology for Monitoring R&I in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies, InnovationDB or activities, and tools developed in H2020 project ODYSSEE-MURE

== List of selected databases ==
During the first workshop (see notes from Day 2), the following databases were selected to analyze and improve their compliance with FAIR and Open data principles:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Name of database !! Short description !! Reasoning of choice !! Current state of FAIR/O principles !! Target of FAIR/O to achieve within EERAdata
|-
| COMETS [https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/837722]
|| Write a short description, e.g., "Database 1 is about XXX, containing XXX data, covering the period xxx."
|| Summarize shortly the main reasons, why this DB was chosen. Link to the discussion page of [[WS1UC4]].
|| What is the current FAIR/O state for this database. Summarize here. In case more space is needed, link to a section of the discussion page of [[WS1UC4]].
|| What FAIR/O target was decided?

|-
| IEA Policy Database [https://www.iea.org/policies] || Database of policies and measures thematically related to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve energy efficiency and support the development and deployment of renewables and other clean energy technologies. It contains data from IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database, along with information on CCUS and methane abatement policies. Data are collected from governments, partner organizations and IEA analysis since 1999. || • A popular, recognized, and world-wide database hosted by a reputable institution. • Since we are not able to analyze all the databases that we would like to - the selection of the IEA Policy database would indirectly allow us to take into account several other, selected databases because it contains data from: IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database, • Cross-use case relevance, as it contains policies and measures also for buildings efficiency (UC1) and for power transmission and distribution networks (UC2). || Example || Example
|-
| EUR-Lex [https://eur-lex.europa.eu] || EUR-Lex is online database that provides the official and most comprehensive access to EU Law and legal documents such as treaties, legal acts from EU institutions, preparatory documents related to EU legislation, EU case-law, international agreements, EFTA documents, references to national case-law related to EU law. EUR-Lex has access to all editions of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ) since the first of December 1952|| • It is available in all of the EU’s 24 official languages
• It is updated daily, which confirms the validity of the documents • Each document in EUR-Lex is supported by detailed information such as: relations with other legal documents, case-law interpretations, dates of adoption or entry into force etc. • It is the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to policy • Most documents in EUR-Lex, regardless of their language, receive a unique identifier - CELEX number, so all documents have a designed structure and each type of document corresponds to a so-called “a descriptor”.|| Example || Example
|-
| JRC database hub [https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/] || The JRC Science Hub aims to gradually integrate and aggregate all of the European Commission's science related activities, tools, laboratories, facilities, databases and networks. The inventory is wide range of the compilation of databases development of software and modelling tools. Published on the basis of open data principles with clear descriptions for each entry. The tools and databases are categorised by name and acronym, but can be filtered by research area, keyword and JRC institute responsible for the coordination of the particular entry. It contains, inter alia, databases related to energy and transport and climate ||• It’s the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to different related aspects also energy policy related • It’s data interpretation is highly dependent on changes in the legal and policy frameworks across European Union. • Enhances the transparency and openness of the JRC and further enables the open access policy of scientific research data. • The information and links provided in the metadata are maintained in distributed and heterogeneous information systems. Although the datasets are maintain and links and information are updated,* Sources of the database are coming in a variety of European languages, all brought together in an English database. • Is cross-use case relevant, as it contains policies and measures also for other use cases. Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|}

== Metadata assessments ==
Databases above were assessed with respect to their current meta practices. The table below summarizes the current state and issues identified during WS 1:
{| class="wikitable"
|-
! Name of database !! Type of metadata provided !! Extend of metadata provided !! Level of implementation of FAIR/O principles !! Frameworks for metadata used !! Technical implementation of metadata
|-
| [[Link to database 1|Database 1]] || Which types of metadata are covered? Administrative, descriptive, structural, provenance of data, etc.? || Summarize: Is it rich or basic metadata provided for each of the types? || Check the Wilkinson criteria for metadata and summarize here. In case more space is needed, link to a section of [[WS1UC4]]. || What framework is used, e.g., controlled vocabulary, taxonomy, thesaurus, ontology? || How are metadata implemented? As xml, plain text, RDF, etc.
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|-
| Example || Example || Example || Example || Example || Example
|}

UC4

2020-06-03T10:44:45Z

Mariuszk: /* List of selected databases */

UC4

2020-06-03T10:42:48Z

Mariuszk: /* List of selected databases */

Talk:WS1UC4

2020-06-03T09:18:48Z

Mariuszk:

* Perhaps, we should decide initially, if we want to only focus on databases that actually contain information on policies or if we want to include databases that include information that is not directly related to policies, but can provide information that is useful for the development of policies? E.g. The COMETS database does not contain information on policies directly, but the information contained in the COMETS database could be valuable for policy development.

*good point we have policy relevant databases and data bases with policy, but for sure both of them are important regarding the topic of uc

* this may help by assessing the database https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/f1-meta-data-assigned-globally-unique-persistent-identifiers/

* i'm thinking about IEA Policy database regarding the use case it's fit perfect

Talk:WS1UC4

2020-06-03T09:17:48Z

Mariuszk:

Talk:WS1UC4

2020-06-03T09:15:20Z

Mariuszk:

Talk:WS1UC4

2020-06-03T08:53:08Z

Mariuszk: use please disscusion

WS1UC4

2020-05-31T16:32:44Z

Mariuszk: /* Notes from the morning session */

This page provides space for notes from workshop discussions of use case 4 during Day 2 of WS1.

== Interactive elements ==
The discussions can also benefit from considering the EERAdata storyboard and/or slido comments. See [[WS1#Interactive_elements]]

== Notes from the morning session ==
The morning session is dedicated to database discussions with the aim to select 3-5 databases from below's list of databases for further examination. The [[UC3#List_of_selected_databases|first table of the WIKI page]] is filled out by noon.

=== Draft list of databases ===
The databases that were identified as containing data in relation to low carbon energy and energy efficiency policy:

#[https://www.copernicus.eu/en Copernicus]
#[https://datacite.org DataCite]
#[https://www.vs.inf.ethz.ch/res/show.html?what=eco-data ECO data set]
#[https://energydata.info/ EnergyData]
#[https://www.resourceefficient.eu/en#explore-content EREK]
#[http://www.eumerci-portal.eu/web/guest/home EU Merci]
#[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en EUR-Lex]
#[https://ec.europa.eu/energy/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-efficient-buildings/eu-bso_en?redir=1 European Buildings Stock Observatory]
#[https://www.iea.org/policies IEA Policies database]
#[https://www.irena.org/Statistics/View-Data-by-Topic/Energy-Transition/REmap-Energy-Demand-and-Supply-by-Sector IRENA, REmap]
#[http://resourceirena.irena.org/gateway/ IRENA, Resource]
#[https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ JRC-database hub]
#[https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/jrc-idees-integrated-database-european-energy-sector-methodological-note JRC-IDEES: Integrated Database of the European Energy Sector: Metodological note]
#[https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/monitoring-ri-low-carbon-energy-technologies JRC: Monitoring R&I in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies
#[https://magic-nexus.eu/metadata-repository MAGIC]
#[https://data.nrel.gov/ NREL data]
#[https://odin.jrc.ec.europa.eu/odin/index.jsp ODIN: Online Data & Information Network for Energy]
#[https://data.oecd.org/ OECD data]
#[https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/home/home.do OEIL]
#[https://openei.org/wiki/Main_Page OPENEI]
#[https://heatroadmap.eu/peta4/ PETA4]
#[https://www.proquest.com/ PROQuest]
#[https://www.reeep.org/reegleinfo REEEP]
#[https://www.re3data.org/ Re3data.org]
#[http://www.res-legal.eu/home/ RES LEGAL]
#[https://setis.ec.europa.eu/publications/setis-research-innovation-data SETIS research and innovation data]
#[https://zenodo.org/ ZENODO]
#[https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/837722 H2020 project COMETS] - EU-wide inventory of collective action initiatives in the low carbon energy transition
#[https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/business_economy_euro/banking_and_finance/documents/200309-sustainable-finance-teg-final-report-taxonomy_en.pdf] - EU taxonomy for green innovation companies

=== Discussion on the choice of databases: ===
* From GIG, apart from IEA Policy database, there will be also a proposition of RESLEGAL, EUR-Lex, DataCite, EU Merci, OECD, and probably also JRC-database.
* @ IUE and ENEA: each of you please suggest 2 other databases and prepare for them a description and an explanation - why we should choose them for further evaluation. Material please put in the Wiki.
* @ all: for databases that you suggested please complete the questionnaire from AIT in OO ([https://energydata.onlyoffice.eu/Products/Files/doceditor.aspx?fileid=5413183] and put answers into the folder in OO [https://energydata.onlyoffice.eu/products/projects/tmdocs.aspx?prjID=236894#1976709] until Friday 29.05.

==== COMETS database: EU-wide inventory of collective action initiatives in the energy transition ====
''Description of database:''
The inventory is a multi-country database of collective action initiatives (e.g., energy cooperatives, eco-villages, community energy projects, and other citizen-led energy projects). For each initiative, the country, the date of foundation/cancellation, the evolution of members and renewable energy units, installation capacities, fields of engagement, legal form, website, address, source, etc. is collected. The entries are sourced from a variety of national, regional, and European registers and websites.

''Rationale for choosing this database'':
*The database is of policy relevance. Its data interpretation is highly dependent on changes in the legal and policy frameworks across Europe.
*We own the database and therefore have it easier to exercise FAIRification and opening activities.
*The database is being created in a parallel running European project and we would not like that the database ends in the graveyard of dead EU project databases.
*We aim at opening the database to the low carbon research community within the next two years.
*We are interested to explore the options for opening while ensuring that our work in building the database is appropriately acknowledged. This is relevant for later EERAdata discussion. Here, we already started discussing with e3s and tJP of EERAdata.
*We can use synergies with another parallel EU project and have the possibility to assign rich metadata to every single entry, by also using the expertise of researchers from the COMETS project.
*The database itself has a relatively simple structure, however, the inventory contains heterogeneous and dynamic data. Thus, it helps us to investigate how to approach FAIRification for such data. This is a particular challenge for UC4.
*Sources of the COMETS database are coming in a variety of European languages, all brought together in an English database. Thus, it helps us to investigate the relevance of languages for FAIRification and opening activities. This is also a particular challenge for UC4.
*We aim at uploading this database as an example for EERAdata to EOSC. We hope to create a best practice example for a FAIR and open database. Currently, it is F - non-existing, A - non-existing., I - partly as one can, e.g., go to the currently published papers to access the original sources. But it is not machine-actionable. R - no, because it is currently not open.

''Reference:'' Wierling, A.; Schwanitz, V.J.; Zeiß, J.P.; Bout, C.; Candelise, C.; Gilcrease, W.; Gregg, J.S. [https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3339 Statistical Evidence on the Role of Energy Cooperatives for the Energy Transition in European Countries]. Sustainability.

==== IEA Policy database ====
''Description of the database:''
A worldwide database of past, future and planned policies and measures thematically related to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve energy efficiency and support the development and deployment of renewables and other clean energy technologies. It contains data from IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database, along with information on CCUS and methane abatement policies. Data are collected from governments, partner organizations and IEA analysis since 1999.

''Rationale for choosing this database:''
* A popular, recognized, and world-wide database hosted by a reputable institution.
* Since we are not able to analyze all the databases that we would like to - the selection of the IEA Policy database would indirectly allow us to take into account several other, selected databases because it contains data from: IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database,
* Cross-use case relevance, as it contains policies and measures also for buildings efficiency (UC1) and for power transmission and distribution networks (UC2).

==== EU Taxonomy for green innovation companies ====
''Description of the database:''
The EU Taxonomy is a tool to help investors, companies, issuers, and project promoters navigate the transition to a low-carbon, resilient and resource-efficient economy. The Taxonomy sets performance thresholds (referred to as ‘technical screening criteria’) for economic activities which: • make a substantive contribution to one of six environmental objectives (Figure 1); • do no significant harm (DNSH) to the other five, where relevant; • meet minimum safeguards (e.g., OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights). The performance thresholds will help companies, project promoters and issuers access green financing to improve their environmental performance, as well as helping to identify which activities are already environmentally friendly. In doing so, it will help to grow low-carbon sectors and decarbonise high-carbon ones. The EU Taxonomy is one of the most significant developments in sustainable finance and will have wide-ranging implications for investors and issuers working in the EU, and beyond.

''Rationale for choosing this database:''
* It is low-hanging fruit because taxonomy is already in place.
* We could use this taxonomy to see how it aligns with our other assessments (and with other use cases)
* The taxonomy will be enacted in a year from now, so we can provide timely feedback

''Reference:'' [[https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/business_economy_euro/banking_and_finance/documents/200309-sustainable-finance-teg-final-report-taxonomy_en.pdf]]

==== EUR-Lex ====
''Description of the database:''
EUR-Lex is online database that provides the official and most comprehensive access to EU Law and legal documents such as treaties, legal acts from EU institutions, preparatory documents related to EU legislation, EU case-law, international agreements, EFTA documents, references to national case-law related to EU law. EUR-Lex has access to all editions of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ) since the first of December 1952.

''Rationale for choosing this database:''
* It is available in all of the EU’s 24 official languages
* It is updated daily, which confirms the validity of the documents
* Each document in EUR-Lex is supported by detailed information such as: relations with other legal documents, case-law interpretations, dates of adoption or entry into force etc.
* It is the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to policy
* Most documents in EUR-Lex, regardless of their language, receive a unique identifier - CELEX number, so all documents have a designed structure and each type of document corresponds to a so-called “a descriptor”.

==== EU MERCI ====
''Description of the database:''
The database contains data on the implementation of energy efficiency measures in the manufacturing industry. For nearly 3000 companies from 4 European countries (Austria, Italy, Poland, United Kingdom), the following information has been collected: size of the company, year of implementation of the measure, type of support received (white certificates), statistical classification of economic activities, according to NACE, applied processes and ways to save energy and total final energy savings achieved by the implemented measures.
The database contains data also on low-carbon policies, examples of business action to reduce emissions, etc.
The database includes data for the 2005-2017 period. Besides the database, also a library, sector reports and static analyses of different countries were made available.

''Rationale for choosing this database:''
* The database contains good practices that can be used by other actors willing to implement energy efficiency measures,
* Disadvantages of the database: It includes data from the 2005-2017 period, with no updates (no newer examples)

==== OECD database ====
''Description of the database:''
OECD database makes available data related to agriculture, development, economy, education, energy, environment, finance, government, health, innovation and technology, jobs and society. In each of these areas the database contains, inter alia, data on legal issues. In the area of energy, data can be assigned thematically to: primary energy supply, crude oil production, electricity generation, renewable energy, nuclear power plants, crude oil import prices.
The data comes from over 130 countries around the world. The database allows sharing data in the form of indicators, maps and tables. The data is collected and made available since 1960.

''Rationale for choosing this database:''
* It is a popular, well recognised worldwide database, maintained by a reputable institution,
* Since we are not able to analyze all the databases that we would like to - the selection of the OECD database would indirectly allow us to take into account several other, selected databases because it contains data from: the IEA database - International Energy Agency (https://www.iea.org/) and Nuclear Energy Agency (http://www.oecd-nea.org/).

==== ISTAT energy data ====
'' Description of the database: ''
I.Stat is the warehouse of statistics currently produced by the Italian National Institute of Statistics.Statistics are searchable by theme. The system is also consultable by keyword. Data are presented in multidimensional tables which users can export in xls, csv formats. Acting on variables, reference periods and the arrangement of heads and sides, moreover, it is possible to obtain custom tables.
Through a web service that allows direct machine-to-machine questioning, organizations, as well as private citizens, can form specific query data, download results. The service is accessible at the following address: https://www.istat.it/it/metodi-e-strumenti/web-service-sdmx

'' Rationale for choosing this database: ''
* It’s a complete overview of energy consumption in Italy in all sectors of the society.

==== SETIS Innovation and Research data ====
'' Description of the database: ''
The level of investment in R&I in terms of both private (expenditure by businesses and industry) and public (Member States' national programmes and instruments), and trends in patents, for the Integrated SET Plan Actions.

'' Rationale for choosing this database: ''
The Integrated SET Plan needs to be underpinned by an effective monitoring and reporting scheme that supports the development and implementation of the European R&I Agenda. SETIS plays a central role in the successful implementation of the Integrated SET Plan 10 key actions. In particular, the enhanced SETIS follows the objectives below:
* To monitor R&I activities, investments and technology progress in Europe;
* To contribute to the identification of gaps in the implementation of the actions;
* To report on the overall progress towards the common goals set out in the integrated SET-Plan;
* To contribute to assessing the impact of the SET-Plan on European competitiveness;
* To make recommendations for actions that could further increase the effectiveness of the European R&I Strategy.

==== ENERGISE Online Database ====
'' Description of the database: ''
The Database is an output of the H2020 Energise Project. The project aims at testing household and community-level initiatives to reduce energy consumption through energy cultures. An output of the project forms the database that contains data on 1067 energy initiatives from 30 European countries.

'' Rationale for choosing this database: ''
* The database contains recent information on a considerable number of (1067) initiatives pertaining to household and community-level energy policies. Thus, its representativeness is for European countries is high.
* Since the focus of the EERAdata project is mainly concerning the European Union countries, this database is a good fit in terms of scope.
* The database hosts information that would be gathered from national sources of each country, hence may be considered as a repository for national databases.

==== Mure Online Database ====
'' Description of the database: ''
MURE (Mesures d'Utilisation Rationnelle de l'Energie) is a comprehensive database that lists energy efficiency policies and measures regarding the Member States of the European Union. It allows for the analysis of policies based on topics, policy interaction, policy scoring, impact evaluation, as well as successful policies. The information is accessible by query in the database. The contributors are French Environment and Energy Management Agency, European Energy Network, and the H2020 program of the European Union.

'' Rationale for choosing this database: ''
* A comprehensive database including energy efficiency policies and measures in the European Union member states.
* Since the focus of the EERAdata project is mainly concerning the European Union countries, this database is a good fit in terms of scope.
* The database hosts information that would be gathered from national sources of each country, hence may be considered as a repository for national databases.
* The database pertains to both Uses Case 4 on Energy Policies and Use Case 1 on Buildings Efficiency.

==== JRC-database hub: Joint Research Centre Data Catalogue ====
'' Description of database: ''
The JRC Science Hub aims to gradually integrate and aggregate all of the European Commission's science related activities, tools, laboratories, facilities, databases and networks. The inventory is wide range of the compilation of databases development of software and modelling tools. Published on the basis of open data principles with clear descriptions for each entry. The tools and databases are categorised by name and acronym, but can be filtered by research area, keyword and JRC institute responsible for the coordination of the particular entry. It contains, inter alia, databases related to energy and transport and climate
'' Rationale for choosing this database: ''
* It’s the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to different related aspects also energy policy related
* It’s data interpretation is highly dependent on changes in the legal and policy frameworks across European Union.
* The database enhances the transparency and openness of the JRC and further enables the open access policy of scientific research data.
* The information and links provided in the metadata are maintained in distributed and heterogeneous information systems. Although the datasets are maintain and links and information are updated,
* Sources of the database are coming in a variety of European languages, all brought together in an English database. Thus, it helps to investigate the relevance for FAIRification and opening activities.
* The database is cross-use case relevant, as it contains policies and measures also for other use cases.

== Notes from the afternoon session ==
The afternoon session is dedicated to discussing metadata for the selected databases. The aim of the afternoon session is to fill out [[UC3#Metadata_assessments|table 2 of the wiki page for the use case]] and to decide what to report back from the use case to the plenary session the next day (again, see the WIKI template for a suggested structure). Thus, at the end of the day, the WIKI page for the use case is complete.

* Bulleted list item

== What to report back to the plenary on Day 3? ==
* Databases selected (names and short reasoning)
* Main insights from discussions
* Suggested next steps
* Other issues

WS1UC4

2020-05-31T16:27:08Z

Mariuszk: /* Discussion on the choice of databases: */

This page provides space for notes from workshop discussions of use case 4 during Day 2 of WS1.

== Interactive elements ==
The discussions can also benefit from considering the EERAdata storyboard and/or slido comments. See [[WS1#Interactive_elements]]

== Notes from the morning session ==
The morning session is dedicated to database discussions with the aim to select 3-5 databases from below's list of databases for further examination. The [[UC3#List_of_selected_databases|first table of the WIKI page]] is filled out by noon.

=== Draft list of databases ===
The databases that were identified as containing data in relation to low carbon energy and energy efficiency policy:

#[https://www.copernicus.eu/en Copernicus]
#[https://datacite.org DataCite]
#[https://www.vs.inf.ethz.ch/res/show.html?what=eco-data ECO data set]
#[https://energydata.info/ EnergyData]
#[https://www.resourceefficient.eu/en#explore-content EREK]
#[http://www.eumerci-portal.eu/web/guest/home EU Merci]
#[https://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en EUR-Lex]
#[https://ec.europa.eu/energy/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-efficient-buildings/eu-bso_en?redir=1 European Buildings Stock Observatory]
#[https://www.iea.org/policies IEA Policies database]
#[https://www.irena.org/Statistics/View-Data-by-Topic/Energy-Transition/REmap-Energy-Demand-and-Supply-by-Sector IRENA, REmap]
#[http://resourceirena.irena.org/gateway/ IRENA, Resource]
#[https://data.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ JRC-database hub]
#[https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/jrc-idees-integrated-database-european-energy-sector-methodological-note JRC-IDEES: Integrated Database of the European Energy Sector: Metodological note]
#[https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/monitoring-ri-low-carbon-energy-technologies JRC: Monitoring R&I in Low-Carbon Energy Technologies
#[https://magic-nexus.eu/metadata-repository MAGIC]
#[https://data.nrel.gov/ NREL data]
#[https://odin.jrc.ec.europa.eu/odin/index.jsp ODIN: Online Data & Information Network for Energy]
#[https://data.oecd.org/ OECD data]
#[https://oeil.secure.europarl.europa.eu/oeil/home/home.do OEIL]
#[https://openei.org/wiki/Main_Page OPENEI]
#[https://heatroadmap.eu/peta4/ PETA4]
#[https://www.proquest.com/ PROQuest]
#[https://www.reeep.org/reegleinfo REEEP]
#[https://www.re3data.org/ Re3data.org]
#[http://www.res-legal.eu/home/ RES LEGAL]
#[https://setis.ec.europa.eu/publications/setis-research-innovation-data SETIS research and innovation data]
#[https://zenodo.org/ ZENODO]
#[https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/837722 H2020 project COMETS] - EU-wide inventory of collective action initiatives in the low carbon energy transition
#[https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/business_economy_euro/banking_and_finance/documents/200309-sustainable-finance-teg-final-report-taxonomy_en.pdf] - EU taxonomy for green innovation companies

=== Discussion on the choice of databases: ===
* From GIG, apart from IEA Policy database, there will be also a proposition of RESLEGAL, EUR-Lex, DataCite, EU Merci, OECD, and probably also JRC-database.
* @ IUE and ENEA: each of you please suggest 2 other databases and prepare for them a description and an explanation - why we should choose them for further evaluation. Material please put in the Wiki.
* @ all: for databases that you suggested please complete the questionnaire from AIT in OO ([https://energydata.onlyoffice.eu/Products/Files/doceditor.aspx?fileid=5413183] and put answers into the folder in OO [https://energydata.onlyoffice.eu/products/projects/tmdocs.aspx?prjID=236894#1976709] until Friday 29.05.

==== COMETS database: EU-wide inventory of collective action initiatives in the energy transition ====
''Description of database:''
The inventory is a multi-country database of collective action initiatives (e.g., energy cooperatives, eco-villages, community energy projects, and other citizen-led energy projects). For each initiative, the country, the date of foundation/cancellation, the evolution of members and renewable energy units, installation capacities, fields of engagement, legal form, website, address, source, etc. is collected. The entries are sourced from a variety of national, regional, and European registers and websites.

''Rationale for choosing this database'':
*The database is of policy relevance. Its data interpretation is highly dependent on changes in the legal and policy frameworks across Europe.
*We own the database and therefore have it easier to exercise FAIRification and opening activities.
*The database is being created in a parallel running European project and we would not like that the database ends in the graveyard of dead EU project databases.
*We aim at opening the database to the low carbon research community within the next two years.
*We are interested to explore the options for opening while ensuring that our work in building the database is appropriately acknowledged. This is relevant for later EERAdata discussion. Here, we already started discussing with e3s and tJP of EERAdata.
*We can use synergies with another parallel EU project and have the possibility to assign rich metadata to every single entry, by also using the expertise of researchers from the COMETS project.
*The database itself has a relatively simple structure, however, the inventory contains heterogeneous and dynamic data. Thus, it helps us to investigate how to approach FAIRification for such data. This is a particular challenge for UC4.
*Sources of the COMETS database are coming in a variety of European languages, all brought together in an English database. Thus, it helps us to investigate the relevance of languages for FAIRification and opening activities. This is also a particular challenge for UC4.
*We aim at uploading this database as an example for EERAdata to EOSC. We hope to create a best practice example for a FAIR and open database. Currently, it is F - non-existing, A - non-existing., I - partly as one can, e.g., go to the currently published papers to access the original sources. But it is not machine-actionable. R - no, because it is currently not open.

''Reference:'' Wierling, A.; Schwanitz, V.J.; Zeiß, J.P.; Bout, C.; Candelise, C.; Gilcrease, W.; Gregg, J.S. [https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/9/3339 Statistical Evidence on the Role of Energy Cooperatives for the Energy Transition in European Countries]. Sustainability.

==== IEA Policy database ====
''Description of the database:''
A worldwide database of past, future and planned policies and measures thematically related to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, improve energy efficiency and support the development and deployment of renewables and other clean energy technologies. It contains data from IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database, along with information on CCUS and methane abatement policies. Data are collected from governments, partner organizations and IEA analysis since 1999.

''Rationale for choosing this database:''
* A popular, recognized, and world-wide database hosted by a reputable institution.
* Since we are not able to analyze all the databases that we would like to - the selection of the IEA Policy database would indirectly allow us to take into account several other, selected databases because it contains data from: IEA/IRENA Renewable Energy Policies and Measures Database, the IEA Energy Efficiency Database, the Addressing Climate Change database, and the Building Energy Efficiency Policies (BEEP) database,
* Cross-use case relevance, as it contains policies and measures also for buildings efficiency (UC1) and for power transmission and distribution networks (UC2).

==== EU Taxonomy for green innovation companies ====
''Description of the database:''
The EU Taxonomy is a tool to help investors, companies, issuers, and project promoters navigate the transition to a low-carbon, resilient and resource-efficient economy. The Taxonomy sets performance thresholds (referred to as ‘technical screening criteria’) for economic activities which: • make a substantive contribution to one of six environmental objectives (Figure 1); • do no significant harm (DNSH) to the other five, where relevant; • meet minimum safeguards (e.g., OECD Guidelines on Multinational Enterprises and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights). The performance thresholds will help companies, project promoters and issuers access green financing to improve their environmental performance, as well as helping to identify which activities are already environmentally friendly. In doing so, it will help to grow low-carbon sectors and decarbonise high-carbon ones. The EU Taxonomy is one of the most significant developments in sustainable finance and will have wide-ranging implications for investors and issuers working in the EU, and beyond.

''Rationale for choosing this database:''
* It is low-hanging fruit because taxonomy is already in place.
* We could use this taxonomy to see how it aligns with our other assessments (and with other use cases)
* The taxonomy will be enacted in a year from now, so we can provide timely feedback

''Reference:'' [[https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/business_economy_euro/banking_and_finance/documents/200309-sustainable-finance-teg-final-report-taxonomy_en.pdf]]

==== EUR-Lex ====
''Description of the database:''
EUR-Lex is online database that provides the official and most comprehensive access to EU Law and legal documents such as treaties, legal acts from EU institutions, preparatory documents related to EU legislation, EU case-law, international agreements, EFTA documents, references to national case-law related to EU law. EUR-Lex has access to all editions of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ) since the first of December 1952.

''Rationale for choosing this database:''
* It is available in all of the EU’s 24 official languages
* It is updated daily, which confirms the validity of the documents
* Each document in EUR-Lex is supported by detailed information such as: relations with other legal documents, case-law interpretations, dates of adoption or entry into force etc.
* It is the open and highly recognizable European Union’s database directly related to policy
* Most documents in EUR-Lex, regardless of their language, receive a unique identifier - CELEX number, so all documents have a designed structure and each type of document corresponds to a so-called “a descriptor”.

==== EU MERCI ====
''Description of the database:''
The database contains data on the implementation of energy efficiency measures in the manufacturing industry. For nearly 3000 companies from 4 European countries (Austria, Italy, Poland, United Kingdom), the following information has been collected: size of the company, year of implementation of the measure, type of support received (white certificates), statistical classification of economic activities, according to NACE, applied processes and ways to save energy and total final energy savings achieved by the implemented measures.
The database contains data also on low-carbon policies, examples of business action to reduce emissions, etc.
The database includes data for the 2005-2017 period. Besides the database, also a library, sector reports and static analyses of different countries were made available.

''Rationale for choosing this database:''
* The database contains good practices that can be used by other actors willing to implement energy efficiency measures,
* Disadvantages of the database: It includes data from the 2005-2017 period, with no updates (no newer examples)

==== OECD database ====
''Description of the database:''
OECD database makes available data related to agriculture, development, economy, education, energy, environment, finance, government, health, innovation and technology, jobs and society. In each of these areas the database contains, inter alia, data on legal issues. In the area of energy, data can be assigned thematically to: primary energy supply, crude oil production, electricity generation, renewable energy, nuclear power plants, crude oil import prices.
The data comes from over 130 countries around the world. The database allows sharing data in the form of indicators, maps and tables. The data is collected and made available since 1960.

''Rationale for choosing this database:''
* It is a popular, well recognised worldwide database, maintained by a reputable institution,
* Since we are not able to analyze all the databases that we would like to - the selection of the OECD database would indirectly allow us to take into account several other, selected databases because it contains data from: the IEA database - International Energy Agency (https://www.iea.org/) and Nuclear Energy Agency (http://www.oecd-nea.org/).

==== ISTAT energy data ====
'' Description of the database: ''
I.Stat is the warehouse of statistics currently produced by the Italian National Institute of Statistics.Statistics are searchable by theme. The system is also consultable by keyword. Data are presented in multidimensional tables which users can export in xls, csv formats. Acting on variables, reference periods and the arrangement of heads and sides, moreover, it is possible to obtain custom tables.
Through a web service that allows direct machine-to-machine questioning, organizations, as well as private citizens, can form specific query data, download results. The service is accessible at the following address: https://www.istat.it/it/metodi-e-strumenti/web-service-sdmx

'' Rationale for choosing this database: ''
* It’s a complete overview of energy consumption in Italy in all sectors of the society.

==== SETIS Innovation and Research data ====
'' Description of the database: ''
The level of investment in R&I in terms of both private (expenditure by businesses and industry) and public (Member States' national programmes and instruments), and trends in patents, for the Integrated SET Plan Actions.

'' Rationale for choosing this database: ''
The Integrated SET Plan needs to be underpinned by an effective monitoring and reporting scheme that supports the development and implementation of the European R&I Agenda. SETIS plays a central role in the successful implementation of the Integrated SET Plan 10 key actions. In particular, the enhanced SETIS follows the objectives below:
* To monitor R&I activities, investments and technology progress in Europe;
* To contribute to the identification of gaps in the implementation of the actions;
* To report on the overall progress towards the common goals set out in the integrated SET-Plan;
* To contribute to assessing the impact of the SET-Plan on European competitiveness;
* To make recommendations for actions that could further increase the effectiveness of the European R&I Strategy.

== Notes from the afternoon session ==
The afternoon session is dedicated to discussing metadata for the selected databases. The aim of the afternoon session is to fill out [[UC3#Metadata_assessments|table 2 of the wiki page for the use case]] and to decide what to report back from the use case to the plenary session the next day (again, see the WIKI template for a suggested structure). Thus, at the end of the day, the WIKI page for the use case is complete.

* Bulleted list item

== What to report back to the plenary on Day 3? ==
* Databases selected (names and short reasoning)
* Main insights from discussions
* Suggested next steps
* Other issues

WS1UC4

2020-05-31T16:11:53Z

Mariuszk: /* Discussion on the choice of databases: */

WS1UC4

2020-05-31T16:09:03Z

Mariuszk: /* Discussion on the choice of databases: */